Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance, voting, and vesting capabilities.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 23, 2026
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
The owner has the authority to call updateMintRate and release, which can increase the total supply of the token. This allows the owner to dilute the value of existing holdings at their discretion, provided they stay within the 2% annual limit.
Transition ownership to a decentralized governance model or a multi-signature wallet to prevent unilateral supply changes.
Unresolved
The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to enable or disable the ability for users to transfer tokens. This effectively gives the owner the power to freeze user assets or halt market activity.
Remove the ability for the owner to pause or lock transfers, or implement a community-driven voting mechanism to trigger such events.
Unresolved
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.0% in wallets, 80.2% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.0%. 3,052 holders in total.
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Acknowledged
3,052 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Acknowledged
Liquidity $50K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $60K (DexScreener, all pools).
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Acknowledged
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $50K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Acknowledged
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Acknowledged
The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance, voting, and vesting capabilities. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage inflation, pool locking, and vesting releases. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high degree of administrative control over token supply and transferability introduces significant centralization risks for token holders.
The contract utilizes well-audited OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, voting, and permit functionality. 7.1 Architecture is modular, and 7.2 Code Security is high due to the use of standard, battle-tested patterns. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via Ownable, though the scope of administrative power is broad. 7.6 External interactions are minimal, reducing the attack surface for reentrancy or flash loan exploits.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are heavily centralized under the contract owner. The owner can unilaterally mint tokens up to a 2% annual limit and toggle transferability via the pool lock mechanism. While these controls allow for protocol management, they represent a single point of failure for token holders. 7.8 Operations are transparent, but users should be aware of the owner's ability to influence market liquidity.
7.7 Upgrades are not applicable as the contract is not a proxy. The logic is immutable, ensuring that the current ruleset cannot be changed without a new deployment. This provides certainty to users regarding the contract's behavior over time.
To mitigate centralization risks, it is recommended to transition ownership to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract (DAO).
This would ensure that critical actions like minting or locking pools require community consensus rather than a single private key. Additionally, consider implementing a timelock controller for all privileged functions. A delay of 24-48 hours on administrative actions would provide users with sufficient notice and the ability to exit their positions if they disagree with proposed changes to the tokenomics or transfer rules.
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page
