Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is Wojak a Scam?

WOJAKEthereum
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 25, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 3d old
SummaryAI Copilot

The PangeaOFT contract implements an Omnichain Fungible Token (OFT) standard.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by endpoint: Other-Contract, supplyreporter: Other-Contract
  • Liquidity not locked
  • Liquidity < $50k
Exact factors
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by endpoint: Other-Contract, supplyreporter: Other-Contract
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
  • Liquidity < $50k ($11,834 across 1 pairs — thin market)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (3d old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 254 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRetained
MintMintable
Liquidity lockNot locked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 25, 202663 holders
19.9%Contracts7.1%Wallets73.0%Everyone else
19.9%Contracts7.1%73.0%Everyone else
ContractsWalletsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
27.0%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking19.9%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell7.1%
  • Everyone else53 holders73.0%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads15.1%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 25, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 25$11.8K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensNot locked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.

Analysed pool$11.8KShare of depth100.0%
Top-1 Unlocked Holder100.0%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%
Unlocked LP held by
0xa6f3…e168

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

Security Findings

2 Medium5 Info
Medium

Centralized Control Over Token Supply

The 'supplyReporter' role can influence the reported supply of the token through the 'reportSupply' function. Additionally, the LayerZero endpoint can trigger minting via 'lzReceive' and 'lzReceiveSimulate'. This allows privileged entities to potentially alter the token's circulating supply metrics.CP-01

Issue

The 'supplyReporter' role can influence the reported supply of the token through the 'reportSupply' function. Additionally, the LayerZero endpoint can trigger minting via 'lzReceive' and 'lzReceiveSimulate'. This allows privileged entities to potentially alter the token's circulating supply metrics.

Fix

Implement a multi-signature wallet for the 'supplyReporter' role and consider adding a timelock to any functions that significantly alter supply parameters to provide transparency and prevent immediate, unauthorized actions.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Liquidity not locked

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0xa6f3…e168 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0xa6f3…e168 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 27.0% of supply. What remains: 7.1% in wallets, 19.9% in other contracts. 63 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 27.0% of supply. What remains: 7.1% in wallets, 19.9% in other contracts. 63 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

63 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

63 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $12K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $39K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $12K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $39K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Meme token

A community token whose value comes from attention rather than a product. Being a meme is not a risk in itself: it is scored on exactly the same contract and market facts as any other token. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: meme vocabulary in name/ticker (wojak). Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $12K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 3 days of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A community token whose value comes from attention rather than a product. Being a meme is not a risk in itself: it is scored on exactly the same contract and market facts as any other token. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: meme vocabulary in name/ticker (wojak). Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $12K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 3 days of market history.

Fix

Expect attention-driven volatility; the facts in this report say whether the contract itself can be used against holders.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — 3 days of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is 3 days old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is 3 days old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 25
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The PangeaOFT contract implements an Omnichain Fungible Token (OFT) standard. The architecture relies on LayerZero for cross-chain messaging and includes specific roles for metadata management and supply reporting. While the code follows standard patterns, the ability for privileged roles to influence supply metrics introduces centralized trust requirements.

Technical8/10Low risk

The contract utilizes the robust LayerZero OFT standard, ensuring standard ERC-20 compatibility and cross-chain interoperability. 7.1 Architecture is well-structured, leveraging OApp modules for secure messaging. 7.2 Code Security is high, with clear separation of concerns between administrative roles and core token logic. 7.6 External dependencies are limited to the LayerZero endpoint, which is a standard industry practice.

Governance4/10Medium risk

7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are centralized. The supplyReporter role has the authority to influence supply reporting, which impacts tokenomics. While restricted, this creates a dependency on the integrity of the address assigned to this role. 7.3 Access Control is correctly implemented using custom modifiers to restrict sensitive functions.

Upgrades4/10Medium risk

7.7 Upgrades are not supported via proxy patterns; the contract is immutable. 7.8 Operations are handled through administrative functions that allow for metadata updates and role management. The lack of upgradeability reduces the risk of malicious logic injection post-deployment.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The protocol should ensure that the addresses assigned to the 'supplyReporter' and 'metadataAuthority' roles are secured via multi-signature wallets or timelock contracts to mitigate the risk of single-point-of-failure compromise.

Regular monitoring of supply-related events is recommended to detect any unexpected changes in the reported supply. Given the centralized nature of these roles, transparency regarding the identity and security practices of the entities holding these keys is essential for maintaining user trust. No further code changes are required for the current implementation.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkEthereum
Token age3d
Contract0x9d7e…16ea
Deployer0xc5d2…9bf5
Badge for your website
Wojak security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 25, 202648Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the WOJAK contract address?

The Wojak contract on Ethereum is 0x9d7e01f6f4dcfbe3df783d18326e4d1fd8be16ea. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is Wojak a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for Wojak is 48/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 25, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Is WOJAK liquidity locked?

Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 25, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $11.8K.

Who holds WOJAK?

As of Oct 25, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 27.0% of the supply across 63 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Wojak?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page