The contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional fee-exclusion logic. Ownership has been renounced, meaning privileged functions are now permanently disabled. The audit identified critical issues regarding token movement and trapped assets.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is VRQQ a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional fee-exclusion logic.
Read the full analysis- LP lock ends in 19d
- Volume/Liquidity > 15×
- Code: Unauthorized Token Movement
- Code: Rounding Loss via Division Before Multiplication
- Code: Trapped ETH Assets
- Code: Ignored Transfer Return Values
Exact factors
- LP lock ends in 19d (short-term protection)
- Volume/Liquidity > 15× (17.0× — wash-trading signal)
- Code: Unauthorized Token Movement (Critical, static analysis)
- Code: Rounding Loss via Division Before Multiplication (Low, static analysis)
- Code: Trapped ETH Assets (Medium, static analysis)
- Code: Ignored Transfer Return Values (High, static analysis)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Nov 6Holders
as of audit · Nov 6, 2026- Burnedout of circulation95.2%
- DEX poolsthe pools' own liquidity0.1%
- Everyone else14,049 holders4.6%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 6, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Nov 6The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.
0x0ed9…97060xe682…9252No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.
Security Findings
CriticalUnauthorized Token Movement
The _executeSwapAndLiquify function allows the contract to move tokens from any address that has previously approved the contract, potentially leading to unauthorized token drainage.CD-01
Issue
The _executeSwapAndLiquify function allows the contract to move tokens from any address that has previously approved the contract, potentially leading to unauthorized token drainage.
Fix
Restrict the scope of token transfers to only those initiated by the contract's own balance or specific authorized pools.
Status
Unresolved
HighIgnored Transfer Return Values
The _executeSwapAndLiquify function fails to check the boolean return value of ERC-20 transfers, which may lead to silent failures in token swaps.CD-04
Issue
The _executeSwapAndLiquify function fails to check the boolean return value of ERC-20 transfers, which may lead to silent failures in token swaps.
Fix
Always verify the return value of transfer and transferFrom calls, or use OpenZeppelin's SafeERC20 library.
Status
Unresolved
MediumTrapped ETH Assets
The contract includes a receive function that accepts ETH, but lacks any mechanism to withdraw or transfer these funds out of the contract.CD-03
Issue
The contract includes a receive function that accepts ETH, but lacks any mechanism to withdraw or transfer these funds out of the contract.
Fix
Implement a withdrawal function restricted to a secure address or ensure the contract does not accept ETH.
Status
Unresolved
LowRounding Loss via Division Before Multiplication
Calculations in _executeSwapAndLiquify and _transfer perform division before multiplication, which causes precision loss and potential rounding errors.CD-02
Issue
Calculations in _executeSwapAndLiquify and _transfer perform division before multiplication, which causes precision loss and potential rounding errors.
Fix
Rearrange mathematical operations to perform multiplication before division to maintain precision.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 95.4% of supply. Of that, 95.2% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 0.0% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. 14,059 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 95.4% of supply. Of that, 95.2% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 0.0% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. 14,059 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
14,059 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
14,059 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoLiquidity time-locked
98.5% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 98.5% is locked in PinkLock02 until 26 Nov 2026 (19 days). Until then nobody — the project included — can withdraw it unless the locker contract itself is flawed; after that date the lock's owner can. That date is close: treat it as short-term protection. 1.5% is held, unlocked, by 2 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
98.5% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 98.5% is locked in PinkLock02 until 26 Nov 2026 (19 days). Until then nobody — the project included — can withdraw it unless the locker contract itself is flawed; after that date the lock's owner can. That date is close: treat it as short-term protection. 1.5% is held, unlocked, by 2 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $377K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $6.4M (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $377K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $6.4M (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 3.9% on buy, 4.02% on sell. Market: $377K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 3.9% on buy, 4.02% on sell. Market: $377K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 6The architecture follows standard ERC-20 patterns with added fee-exclusion logic. 7.1 Architecture is standard, 7.2 Code Security shows critical flaws in transfer handling, and 7.3 Access Control is now effectively locked due to renounced ownership. 7.6 External interactions are limited but contain logic errors in swap execution.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance risks are minimal as ownership is renounced. The contract cannot change fee parameters or mint new tokens. The primary economic risk is the inability to recover ETH sent to the contract address.
7.7 Upgrades are not applicable as the contract is not a proxy. 7.8 Operations are stable since the contract is immutable and ownership is renounced.
The contract should be considered high-risk due to the critical vulnerability in the swap-and-liquify function.
Users should be aware that any ETH sent to this contract is permanently locked and unrecoverable. Given that ownership is renounced, the current vulnerabilities cannot be patched. It is recommended to migrate to a new, audited contract that implements proper return value checking and safe math practices.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Nov 6, 202684High
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the VRQQ contract address?
The VRQQ contract on BNB Chain is 0x1caf4ce8086c0865295f78cafcf5726422fefcb5. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is VRQQ a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for VRQQ is 84/100 (High risk) as of Nov 6, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Renounced; Mint: No mint; Liquidity lock: Locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 3.9% / 4%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Is VRQQ liquidity locked?
Liquidity lock: Locked (as of Nov 6, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $377.2K.
Who holds VRQQ?
As of Nov 6, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 95.4% of the supply across 14,059 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of VRQQ?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified