Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is Variational a Scam?

VAREthereum
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Nov 4, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 1d old
SummaryAI Copilot

The Variational contract is a standard ERC-20 token implementation.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Liquidity < $50k
  • Code: Non-Compliant Return Values in Transfer Functions
Exact factors
  • Liquidity < $50k ($33,498 across 1 pairs — thin market)
  • Code: Non-Compliant Return Values in Transfer Functions (High, static analysis)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (1d old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Nov 46 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipUnknown
MintNo mint
Liquidity lockLocked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Nov 4, 2026157 holders
12.3%Contracts13.4%Wallets3.9%70.5%Everyone else
12.3%13.4%70.5%Everyone else
ContractsWalletsBurnedEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
29.5%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking12.3%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell13.4%
  • Burnedout of circulation3.9%
  • Everyone else147 holders70.5%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads18.3%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 4, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Nov 4$33.5K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensLocked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.

Analysed pool$33.5KShare of depth100.0%
LP Burned100.0% · ≈ permanent lock
LP Locked100.0% · Dead Address

Security Findings

1 High6 Info
High

Non-Compliant Return Values in Transfer Functions

The transfer and transferFrom functions do not correctly handle return values in accordance with the ERC-20 standard. This can cause external smart contracts that expect a boolean success indicator to fail or behave unpredictably when interacting with this token.CD-01

Issue

The transfer and transferFrom functions do not correctly handle return values in accordance with the ERC-20 standard. This can cause external smart contracts that expect a boolean success indicator to fail or behave unpredictably when interacting with this token.

Fix

Update the transfer and transferFrom functions to explicitly return 'true' upon successful execution and ensure that any failure conditions trigger a revert rather than returning 'false'.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 29.5% of supply. Of that, 3.9% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 13.4% in wallets, 12.3% in other contracts. 157 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 29.5% of supply. Of that, 3.9% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 13.4% in wallets, 12.3% in other contracts. 157 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

157 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

157 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Liquidity burned — cannot be withdrawn

100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $33K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $162K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $33K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $162K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $33K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $33K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — 1 day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 4
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The Variational contract is a standard ERC-20 token implementation. The audit identified a critical logic flaw regarding the return values of transfer functions, which may cause integration failures with external DeFi protocols. No privileged administrative functions were identified, limiting the scope of centralization risks.

Technical8/10Low risk

The contract utilizes standard OpenZeppelin-style ERC-20 logic for token transfers and allowances. 7.1 Architecture is straightforward, relying on internal state management for balances. 7.2 Code Security is generally high due to the use of established libraries, though 7.3 Access Control is absent as there are no administrative roles. 7.6 External integration is compromised by the identified return value inconsistency.

Governance8/10Low risk

7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance factors are minimal as the contract lacks minting, burning, or fee-switching capabilities. The token supply is fixed upon deployment. There are no governance mechanisms or economic levers present in the current implementation.

Upgrades8/10Low risk

7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy. The logic is immutable, ensuring 7.8 Operations remain consistent over time. No risk of unauthorized logic changes exists.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The primary recommendation is to ensure that all transfer functions strictly adhere to the ERC-20 standard by returning a boolean value that accurately reflects the success or failure of the operation.

Developers should verify that the internal transfer logic does not revert silently or return incorrect status codes that could mislead calling contracts. Furthermore, ensure that any future integrations with decentralized exchanges or lending protocols are tested against this specific implementation to prevent liquidity lock-ups caused by the identified return value discrepancy.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkEthereum
Token age1d
Contract0x69ce…2cfc
Deployer0x493a…3c3d
Badge for your website
Variational security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Nov 4, 202640Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Variational?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified