The Variational contract is a standard ERC-20 token implementation. The audit identified a critical logic flaw regarding the return values of transfer functions, which may cause integration failures with external DeFi protocols. No privileged administrative functions were identified, limiting the scope of centralization risks.

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is Variational a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The Variational contract is a standard ERC-20 token implementation.
Read the full analysis- Liquidity < $50k
- Code: Non-Compliant Return Values in Transfer Functions
Exact factors
- Liquidity < $50k ($33,498 across 1 pairs — thin market)
- Code: Non-Compliant Return Values in Transfer Functions (High, static analysis)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Nov 4Holders
as of audit · Nov 4, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking12.3%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell13.4%
- Burnedout of circulation3.9%
- Everyone else147 holders70.5%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 4, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Nov 4The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.
Security Findings
HighNon-Compliant Return Values in Transfer Functions
The transfer and transferFrom functions do not correctly handle return values in accordance with the ERC-20 standard. This can cause external smart contracts that expect a boolean success indicator to fail or behave unpredictably when interacting with this token.CD-01
Issue
The transfer and transferFrom functions do not correctly handle return values in accordance with the ERC-20 standard. This can cause external smart contracts that expect a boolean success indicator to fail or behave unpredictably when interacting with this token.
Fix
Update the transfer and transferFrom functions to explicitly return 'true' upon successful execution and ensure that any failure conditions trigger a revert rather than returning 'false'.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 29.5% of supply. Of that, 3.9% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 13.4% in wallets, 12.3% in other contracts. 157 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 29.5% of supply. Of that, 3.9% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 13.4% in wallets, 12.3% in other contracts. 157 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
157 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
157 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoLiquidity burned — cannot be withdrawn
100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $33K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $162K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $33K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $162K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $33K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $33K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — 1 day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 4The contract utilizes standard OpenZeppelin-style ERC-20 logic for token transfers and allowances. 7.1 Architecture is straightforward, relying on internal state management for balances. 7.2 Code Security is generally high due to the use of established libraries, though 7.3 Access Control is absent as there are no administrative roles. 7.6 External integration is compromised by the identified return value inconsistency.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance factors are minimal as the contract lacks minting, burning, or fee-switching capabilities. The token supply is fixed upon deployment. There are no governance mechanisms or economic levers present in the current implementation.
7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy. The logic is immutable, ensuring 7.8 Operations remain consistent over time. No risk of unauthorized logic changes exists.
The primary recommendation is to ensure that all transfer functions strictly adhere to the ERC-20 standard by returning a boolean value that accurately reflects the success or failure of the operation.
Developers should verify that the internal transfer logic does not revert silently or return incorrect status codes that could mislead calling contracts. Furthermore, ensure that any future integrations with decentralized exchanges or lending protocols are tested against this specific implementation to prevent liquidity lock-ups caused by the identified return value discrepancy.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Nov 4, 202640Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Variational?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified