The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer. Consequently, the source code is unavailable for security analysis. Investors should exercise extreme caution as the lack of transparency prevents verification of ownership, tax mechanisms, or potential backdoors.
Early-stage security check β honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is UTDF π₯ a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot β the tokenβs risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer.
Read the full analysis- Mint capability UNKNOWN
- Ownership status UNKNOWN
- LP lock status UNKNOWN β the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
- Contract source not verified β its logic cannot be read
Exact factors
- Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
- Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
- LP lock status UNKNOWN β the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (31.2% total β 31.2% effective; 31.2% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts)
- Contract source NOT verified β its logic cannot be read
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit Β· Nov 3Holders
as of audit Β· Nov 3, 2026- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell31.2%
- Everyone else496 holders68.8%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 3, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit Β· Nov 3The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
Security Findings
CriticalUnverified Source Code
The contract source code is not verified on the block explorer, preventing any security analysis or verification of contract logic.C-01
Issue
The contract source code is not verified on the block explorer, preventing any security analysis or verification of contract logic.
Fix
Publish the source code on the block explorer and undergo a professional security audit.
Status
Unresolved
HighOpaque Administrative Controls
Due to the lack of verification, it is impossible to determine if the contract owner has malicious privileges such as minting, pausing, or blacklisting.H-01
Issue
Due to the lack of verification, it is impossible to determine if the contract owner has malicious privileges such as minting, pausing, or blacklisting.
Fix
Renounce ownership or provide a public, verifiable multi-sig governance structure if administrative control is required.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 31.2% of supply. What remains: 31.2% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 17.2%. 506 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 31.2% of supply. What remains: 31.2% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 17.2%. 506 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks β those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
506 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
506 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $122K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $981K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $122K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $981K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown β they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics β Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $122K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics β Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $122K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched β less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score β a new token is not a risky one by default β but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score β a new token is not a risky one by default β but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit Β· Nov 37.1 Architecture: Unknown. 7.2 Code Security: Cannot be audited due to lack of source code. 7.3 Access Control: Cannot be verified. 7.6 External: Unknown dependencies.
7.4 Economic: Tokenomics and tax logic are hidden from public view. 7.5 Governance: Administrative privileges cannot be identified. The inability to inspect the contract poses a severe risk of rug-pulls or hidden minting functions.
7.7 Upgrades: It is impossible to determine if the contract is upgradeable or immutable. 7.8 Operations: Operational risks are high due to the lack of transparency regarding contract ownership and emergency controls.
Do not interact with or provide liquidity to this contract. Without verified source code, there is no way to ensure the safety of funds or the integrity of the token's economic model.
Prioritize assets with verified, audited, and transparent codebases.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Nov 3, 202661Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots β history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of UTDF π₯?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code β free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified