The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage inflation rates and pool access. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high degree of administrative control poses a significant centralization risk to token holders.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is United States Dividend Program🔥 a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities.
Read the full analysis- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.2% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.0% in contracts; 3.8% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 24Holders
as of audit · Oct 24, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.0%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
- Burnedout of circulation3.8%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 24, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 24The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
Security Findings
MediumCentralized Minting Authority
The owner has the ability to increase the total supply of tokens via the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows for the dilution of existing token holders' value at the owner's discretion.CP-01
Issue
The owner has the ability to increase the total supply of tokens via the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows for the dilution of existing token holders' value at the owner's discretion.
Fix
Implement a timelock on minting functions or transition ownership to a decentralized governance contract to prevent unilateral supply changes.
Status
Unresolved
MediumCentralized Control Over Token Transfers
The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to enable or disable token transfers. This grants the owner the power to effectively freeze user assets or halt trading activity.CP-05
Issue
The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to enable or disable token transfers. This grants the owner the power to effectively freeze user assets or halt trading activity.
Fix
Remove the ability to arbitrarily lock transfers or restrict this functionality to specific, transparent, and time-bound scenarios enforced by governance.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 7,034 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 7,034 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
7,034 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
7,034 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $446K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.0M (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $446K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.0M (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Its name presents it as a stable-value coin, yet it trades at $0.9139 — it does not hold a peg. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $446K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Its name presents it as a stable-value coin, yet it trades at $0.9139 — it does not hold a peg. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $446K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 24The architecture utilizes standard OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, Votes, and Permit functionality, ensuring robust base implementation. 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security are well-aligned with industry standards. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via Ownable, though the scope of authority is broad. 7.6 External dependencies are minimal and well-vetted.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are heavily centralized under the contract owner. The owner has the ability to mint tokens and toggle transfer restrictions, which directly impacts token value and liquidity. While minting is capped at 2% annually, the lack of a timelock or multi-signature requirement for these actions is a notable concern.
7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy. 7.8 Operations are straightforward, relying on standard administrative functions. The absence of upgradeability reduces complexity but limits the ability to patch logic errors without a migration.
It is recommended to transition ownership to a decentralized governance model, such as a DAO or a multi-signature wallet, to mitigate the risks associated with a single point of failure.
Implementing a timelock on sensitive functions like updateMintRate and lockPool would provide transparency and allow the community to react to administrative changes. Furthermore, consider documenting the specific criteria for pool locking to ensure transparency for users. Regular monitoring of the minting activity and pool status is advised to ensure the protocol remains within expected economic parameters.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 24, 202655Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the USDP contract address?
The United States Dividend Program🔥 (USDP) contract on Base is 0xf0a941a47e2243eea31312691433d6222eb4472b. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is United States Dividend Program🔥 a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for United States Dividend Program🔥 is 55/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 24, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Who holds USDP?
As of Oct 24, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 100.0% of the supply across 7,034 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of United States Dividend Program🔥?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page