Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is UDTF a Scam?

Base
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 27, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 5h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance and vesting features.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Top-10 concentration > 50%
Exact factors
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Top-10 concentration > 50% (99.1% total → 51.5% effective; 19.8% in EOAs, 79.3% in contracts)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (5h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 274 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRetained
MintMintable
Liquidity lockUnknown
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 27, 202638 holders
79.3%Contracts19.8%Wallets
79.3%Contracts19.8%Wallets
ContractsWalletsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
99.1%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking79.3%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell19.8%
  • Everyone else28 holders0.9%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads51.5%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 27, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 27$1.27M

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensUnknown

Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.

Analysed pool$1.27MShare of depth100.0%

Security Findings

2 Medium5 Info
Medium

Centralized Minting Authority

The owner has the authority to call updateMintRate and release, which can increase the total supply of the token. This allows the owner to dilute existing token holders at their discretion.CP-01

Issue

The owner has the authority to call updateMintRate and release, which can increase the total supply of the token. This allows the owner to dilute existing token holders at their discretion.

Fix

Implement a timelock for minting operations or move the minting authority to a decentralized governance mechanism to prevent arbitrary supply increases.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Centralized Control Over Token Transfers

The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to enable or disable token transfers. This gives the owner the power to freeze user assets or prevent trading activity at any time.CP-05

Issue

The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to enable or disable token transfers. This gives the owner the power to freeze user assets or prevent trading activity at any time.

Fix

Remove the ability to arbitrarily pause transfers or restrict this functionality to a decentralized emergency pause mechanism with clear, predefined conditions.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 99.1% of supply. What remains: 19.8% in wallets, 79.3% in other contracts. 38 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 99.1% of supply. What remains: 19.8% in wallets, 79.3% in other contracts. 38 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

38 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

38 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $1.3M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.0M (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $1.3M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.0M (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $1.3M of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $1.3M of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 27
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance and vesting features. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage inflation and transfer restrictions. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high level of administrative control over token supply and transferability introduces significant trust requirements for token holders.

Technical6/10Medium risk

The architecture leverages established OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, Votes, and Permit functionality, ensuring 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security standards are met. 7.3 Access Control is implemented via Ownable, though it grants extensive power to the owner. 7.6 External interactions are minimal, reducing the attack surface for external exploits.

Governance2/10High risk

7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance risks are elevated due to the owner's ability to mint tokens and toggle transferability. While 7.8 Operations are simplified by these functions, they allow for potential dilution of holders and arbitrary freezing of assets. The 2% annual inflation cap provides a baseline protection against hyper-inflationary events.

Upgrades4/10Medium risk

7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy. The logic is immutable, which provides certainty to users regarding the contract's behavior. No upgrade-related vulnerabilities exist.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

To improve security, consider transitioning ownership to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to mitigate the risk of a single point of failure.

Additionally, implementing a timelock on sensitive functions like updateMintRate would provide transparency and allow the community to react to significant changes in tokenomics.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkBase
Token age5h
Contract0x7408…299f
Deployer0xdc7e…35ef
Badge for your website
UDTF security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 27, 202665High

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of UDTF?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified