Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is UDTF a Scam?

Base
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 28, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 7h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.2% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.0% in contracts; 3.8% burned, locked or in pools excluded)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (7h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 284 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRetained
MintMintable
Liquidity lockUnknown
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 28, 202616 holders
80.0%Contracts16.2%Wallets3.8%
80.0%Contracts16.2%Wallets3.8%
ContractsWalletsBurnedBubble area = share of supply
100.0%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.0%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
  • Burnedout of circulation3.8%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads48.2%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 28, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 28$3.78M

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensUnknown

Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.

Analysed pool$3.78MShare of depth100.0%

Security Findings

2 Medium5 Info
Medium

Centralized Minting Authority

The owner has the ability to increase the total supply of the token through the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows the owner to dilute the holdings of all existing token holders at their discretion.CP-01

Issue

The owner has the ability to increase the total supply of the token through the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows the owner to dilute the holdings of all existing token holders at their discretion.

Fix

Implement a timelock for minting operations or transition ownership to a decentralized governance model to ensure community oversight.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Centralized Transfer Control

The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to enable or disable token transfers. This gives the owner the power to freeze user funds or halt market activity entirely.CP-05

Issue

The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to enable or disable token transfers. This gives the owner the power to freeze user funds or halt market activity entirely.

Fix

Remove the ability to arbitrarily lock transfers or restrict this functionality to emergency scenarios governed by a multi-signature or decentralized vote.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 16 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 16 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

16 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

16 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $3.8M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.0M (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $3.8M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.0M (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $3.8M of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $3.8M of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 28
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities. The architecture relies heavily on a centralized owner account, which possesses significant control over token supply and transferability. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the centralization of power presents a notable risk to token holders.

Technical8/10Low risk

The contract utilizes well-tested OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20 and governance features. 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security are robust, adhering to standard implementation patterns. However, 7.3 Access Control is highly centralized, granting the owner full authority over critical state variables. 7.8 Operations are straightforward, though the reliance on owner-triggered functions for minting and locking introduces operational risk.

Governance3/10High risk

7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are dominated by the owner's ability to mint tokens and restrict transfers. While 7.6 External interactions are minimal, the owner's capacity to modify the mint rate and lock pools directly impacts the token's economic stability. There are no decentralized governance mechanisms currently implemented to check these powers.

Upgrades4/10Medium risk

7.7 Upgrades are not applicable as the contract is not a proxy. The logic is immutable, which provides security against proxy-related vulnerabilities but prevents logic updates without a migration. The current deployment is fixed and transparent.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

It is recommended to transition ownership to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to mitigate the risks associated with a single point of failure.

Additionally, implementing a timelock on sensitive functions like updateMintRate would provide transparency and protection for token holders against sudden economic changes.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkBase
Token age7h
Contract0xdb39…d038
Deployer0xcdc5…86fb
Badge for your website
UDTF security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 28, 202659Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of UDTF?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified