Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Is Traivo a Scam?

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page →

Traivo TRVO
0x0d2f…eaa9
Ethereum
Not verifiedThis record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked today 1 audit on record New Launch · 16h old
DexScreener ↗
How is this score calculated? → Low Risk
Executive SummaryAI Copilot

The audit of the LaunchToken contract revealed it to be a standard ERC-20 token implementation. No critical or high-severity vulnerabilities were identified. The contract lacks privileged functions or complex transfer logic, contributing to a low overall risk profile.

1 Medium6 Informational
! Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (16h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.
Volume 24h
$110.8K
Liquidity
$20.2K
Price
$0.00003703
Token Age
16h
Top 10 Holders
57.2%

Security Findings

1 Med6 Info
Medium

Liquidity not locked

QA-LIQUIDITY0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0x1d9b…ca4b — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Issue0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0x1d9b…ca4b — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
FixCheck the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

No issues identified in the reviewed source

I-01The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.
IssueThe verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.
FixRe-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Who holds the supply

QA-HOLDERSThe ten largest holders own 57.2% of supply. Of that, 5.3% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 17.4% in wallets, 34.5% in other contracts. 112 holders in total.
IssueThe ten largest holders own 57.2% of supply. Of that, 5.3% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 17.4% in wallets, 34.5% in other contracts. 112 holders in total.
FixWatch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Not listed by any independent source

QA-IDENTITY112 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Issue112 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
FixMatch the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

The market for this token

QA-MARKETLiquidity $20K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $111K (DexScreener, all pools).
IssueLiquidity $20K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $111K (DexScreener, all pools).
FixSize any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Asset class: Project token

QA-PROFILEA token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $20K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
IssueA token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $20K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
FixCheck the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

QA-RECENTThe token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
IssueThe token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
FixRe-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalLow10/10

The LaunchToken contract implements the standard ERC-20 token interface, providing basic functionalities like `transfer`, `transferFrom`, and `approve`. (7.1 Architecture, 7.2 Code Security) The static analysis confirmed the absence of privileged functions, meaning no single address can alter core token behavior or restrict transfers. (7.3 Access Control) The contract's simplicity and adherence to the ERC-20 standard minimize common technical vulnerabilities.

GovernanceMedium5/10

The LaunchToken contract does not incorporate any specific governance mechanisms or complex economic models beyond standard ERC-20 tokenomics. (7.4 Economic, 7.5 Governance) There are no special fees, taxes, or burning mechanisms, nor are there any roles that can pause transfers or modify token supply post-deployment beyond standard ERC-20 operations. This simplicity reduces the attack surface related to economic manipulation or governance exploits.

UpgradesLow9/10

The LaunchToken contract is not implemented as a proxy and therefore is not upgradeable. (7.7 Upgrades) This design choice eliminates risks associated with upgradeability patterns, such as proxy initialization errors or logic bugs introduced in future implementations. The contract's immutability ensures its behavior remains consistent over time.

Security Checklist

3/5 checks passed
Contract VerifiedPass
Ownership Renounced?
No Mint FunctionPass
Liquidity LockedFail
Not a ProxyPass
HoneypotNoneBuy Tax0.0%Sell Tax0.0%

Holder Composition

57.2% in top 10
17.4% in wallets34.5% in contracts
Effective Concentration31.2%

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Liquidity Depth

$20.2K

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

LP Distribution

Top-1 Unlocked Holder100.0%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%

Key Addresses

2 addresses
Deployer
0x4dfc…f0b8
Unlocked LP Held By
0x1d9b…ca4b

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

What Raised This Score

3 factors
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
  • Liquidity < $50k ($20,182 across 1 pairs — thin market)
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (57.2% total → 31.2% effective; 17.4% in EOAs, 34.5% in contracts; 5.3% burned, locked or in pools excluded)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Related Audits

6 more on the record
PrometheusLow RiskVERA (VRA)Low RiskStarmanLow RiskI love puppies (PUPPIES)Low RiskAliensLow RiskShiba Inu Treat (TREAT)Low Risk

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Traivo?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit