Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is 销毁丸 a Scam?

BNB Chain
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Nov 6, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 1d old
SummaryAI Copilot

The contract at the provided address is not verified on the BSC block explorer.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Mint capability UNKNOWN
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN
  • Liquidity < $50k
  • Contract source not verified — its logic cannot be read
Exact factors
  • Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
  • Liquidity < $50k ($44,690 across 1 pairs — thin market)
  • Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (1d old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Nov 63 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedNot verified
OwnershipUnknown
MintUnknown
Liquidity lockLocked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax3% / 3%

Holders

as of audit · Nov 6, 20261,304 holders
90.1%Burned2.0%2.4%4.6%
90.1%Burned4.6%
ContractsWalletsBurnedLockedDEX poolsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
95.4%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking0.2%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell0.8%
  • Burnedout of circulation90.1%
  • Lockedtime-locked2.0%
  • DEX poolsthe pools' own liquidity2.4%
  • Everyone else1,294 holders4.6%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads0.8%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 6, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Nov 6$44.7K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensLocked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.

Analysed pool$44.7KShare of depth100.0%
LP Burned100.0% · ≈ permanent lock
LP Locked100.0% · Null Address

Security Findings

1 Critical1 High6 Info
Critical

Unverified Source Code

The contract source code is not published on the block explorer. This prevents any security analysis or verification of contract logic.C-01

Issue

The contract source code is not published on the block explorer. This prevents any security analysis or verification of contract logic.

Fix

Publish and verify the source code on the block explorer to allow for community and security review.

Status

Unresolved

High

Opaque Administrative Privileges

Due to the lack of source code, it is impossible to determine if the contract contains owner-only functions that could lead to fund theft, blacklisting, or unauthorized minting.H-02

Issue

Due to the lack of source code, it is impossible to determine if the contract contains owner-only functions that could lead to fund theft, blacklisting, or unauthorized minting.

Fix

Renounce ownership or provide a transparent, time-locked governance structure if the contract is intended for public use.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 95.4% of supply. Of that, 90.1% burned, 2.0% locked, 2.4% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 0.8% in wallets, 0.2% in other contracts. 1,304 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 95.4% of supply. Of that, 90.1% burned, 2.0% locked, 2.4% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 0.8% in wallets, 0.2% in other contracts. 1,304 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

1,304 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

1,304 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Liquidity burned — cannot be withdrawn

100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $45K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $128K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $45K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $128K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 3% on buy, 2.99% on sell. Market: $45K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 3% on buy, 2.99% on sell. Market: $45K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — 1 day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 6
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The contract at the provided address is not verified on the BSC block explorer. Consequently, the source code is inaccessible for security analysis. Investors should exercise extreme caution as the lack of transparency prevents verification of ownership, tax mechanisms, or potential backdoors.

Technical6/10Medium risk

7.1 Architecture: Unknown. 7.2 Code Security: Cannot be evaluated due to lack of source code. 7.3 Access Control: Cannot be verified, posing a risk of unauthorized administrative actions. 7.6 External: Interactions with external protocols cannot be audited.

Governance5/10Medium risk

7.4 Economic: Tokenomics and tax logic are opaque. 7.5 Governance: Potential for rug-pulls or malicious minting cannot be ruled out. 7.8 Operations: Operational security is entirely dependent on the unknown deployer's intent.

Upgrades7/10Low risk

7.7 Upgrades: The upgradeability status is unknown. Without source code, it is impossible to determine if the contract is a proxy or if it contains hidden upgrade logic.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

Do not interact with this contract. The absence of verified source code is a major red flag that prevents any meaningful security assessment.

Without transparency, there is no way to ensure the safety of funds or the integrity of the token's economic model.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
Type-
NetworkBNB Chain
Token age1d
Contract0x96b7…0c71
Deployer0x390f…2cbf
Badge for your website
销毁丸 security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Nov 6, 202659Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of 销毁丸?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified