The SAFToken contract implements a standard ERC20 token with Ownable access control, inheriting from battle-tested OpenZeppelin libraries. The token supply is fixed at deployment, with no further minting or burning capabilities. The contract exhibits a high degree of security due to its reliance on well-audited components and minimal custom logic. No critical or high-severity vulnerabilities were identified.

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is Sustainable Aviation Fuel a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The SAFToken contract implements a standard ERC20 token with Ownable access control, inheriting from battle-tested OpenZeppelin libraries.
Read the full analysis- Ownership not renounced — owner is an EOA
- Top-10 concentration > 70%
- Token age < 7 days
Exact factors
- Ownership NOT renounced — owner is an EOA (single private key)
- Top-10 concentration > 70% (99.1% total → 78.1% effective; 64.0% in EOAs, 35.0% in contracts — extreme)
- Token age < 7 days (early, volatile)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Sep 4Holders
as of audit · Sep 4, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking35.0%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell64.0%
- Everyone elsethe rest of the supply0.9%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Sep 4, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Sep 4The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.
Security Findings
InfoFixed Token Supply
The SAFToken contract mints all 1,000,000,000 tokens to the initialOwner during its constructor execution. There are no public mint or burn functions available, meaning the total supply of the token is fixed at deployment and cannot be altered by any entity, including the contract owner. This is a design choice that impacts the token's economic model.I-01
Issue
The SAFToken contract mints all 1,000,000,000 tokens to the initialOwner during its constructor execution. There are no public mint or burn functions available, meaning the total supply of the token is fixed at deployment and cannot be altered by any entity, including the contract owner. This is a design choice that impacts the token's economic model.
Fix
No action is required if a fixed supply is the intended design. Ensure this fixed supply model is clearly communicated to token holders and stakeholders, as it prevents future inflation or deflation through contract-controlled mechanisms.
Status
Unresolved
InfoUnused Interfaces Imported
The contract imports IERC721Errors and IERC1155Errors interfaces. However, the SAFToken contract is an ERC20 token and does not implement any ERC721 or ERC1155 functionalities. Consequently, these imported interfaces are not utilized within the contract's logic.I-02
Issue
The contract imports IERC721Errors and IERC1155Errors interfaces. However, the SAFToken contract is an ERC20 token and does not implement any ERC721 or ERC1155 functionalities. Consequently, these imported interfaces are not utilized within the contract's logic.
Fix
While harmless, removing unused imports can slightly reduce the compiled contract size and improve code readability by eliminating unnecessary dependencies. Consider removing interface IERC721Errors and interface IERC1155Errors if they are not intended for future use.
Status
Unresolved
InfoReliance on Standard OpenZeppelin Libraries
The SAFToken contract primarily inherits and utilizes the ERC20 and Ownable implementations from OpenZeppelin Contracts. These libraries are widely used, battle-tested, and have undergone extensive audits by the community and professional auditors. This reliance significantly reduces the likelihood of common vulnerabilities such as reentrancy, integer overflows/underflows, and basic access control flaws within the core token functionalities.I-03
Issue
The SAFToken contract primarily inherits and utilizes the ERC20 and Ownable implementations from OpenZeppelin Contracts. These libraries are widely used, battle-tested, and have undergone extensive audits by the community and professional auditors. This reliance significantly reduces the likelihood of common vulnerabilities such as reentrancy, integer overflows/underflows, and basic access control flaws within the core token functionalities.
Fix
Continue to leverage well-audited and maintained libraries like OpenZeppelin. When introducing custom logic, ensure it is thoroughly reviewed and tested to maintain the overall security posture established by the base contracts.
Status
Unresolved
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Sep 4The technical architecture (7.1) is robust, leveraging OpenZeppelin's highly audited ERC20 and Ownable contracts. Code security (7.2) is strong, benefiting from the unchecked blocks being correctly applied where prior checks prevent underflow/overflow, and standard error handling. Access control (7.3) is managed via the Ownable pattern, granting the deployer the ability to transfer or renounce ownership, but no special token-related privileges post-deployment. The contract does not introduce new attack vectors like reentrancy or flash loan vulnerabilities.
The economic model (7.4) for SAFToken is straightforward: a fixed supply of 1 billion tokens is minted to the initial owner during deployment, with no subsequent minting or burning mechanisms. This design ensures predictable tokenomics without inflationary pressures from the contract itself. Governance (7.5) is minimal, relying solely on the Ownable pattern for managing contract ownership, allowing the owner to transfer or renounce this role. There are no complex governance modules or voting systems.
The SAFToken contract is implemented as a standard, non-upgradeable contract (7.7). It does not utilize any proxy patterns (e.g., UUPS, Transparent) or other mechanisms for future modification of its logic. This design choice eliminates upgrade-related risks such as proxy misconfigurations, storage collisions, or insecure upgrade paths, ensuring immutability of the deployed code.
To maintain the high security posture, ensure that the private key controlling the initial owner address is secured with robust practices, such as a hardware wallet or multi-signature setup.
While the contract itself is immutable and secure, the security of the owner's address is paramount for the transferOwnership function. Consider formal verification for any future custom logic if the project expands beyond standard OpenZeppelin implementations.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Aug 20, 202656Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Sustainable Aviation Fuel?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page