Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is Senderbot a Scam?

SENDERBOTEthereum
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 31, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 10h old
SummaryAI Copilot

LaunchToken is an EIP-1167 minimal clone implementation featuring integrated holder rewards.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through; held by factory: EOA
  • Owner can change the buy/sell tax
  • A privileged address can change transfer or wallet limits
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN
  • Liquidity not locked
  • Liquidity < $50k
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through; held by factory: EOA
  • Owner can change the buy/sell tax
  • A privileged address can change transfer or wallet limits
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — who holds it cannot be verified
  • Liquidity < $50k ($17,803 across 1 pairs — thin market)
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (84.3% total → 45.9% effective; 20.3% in EOAs, 64.1% in contracts)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (10h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 315 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipUnknown
MintNo mint
Liquidity lockNot locked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 31, 202655 holders
64.1%Contracts20.3%Wallets15.7%Everyone else
64.1%Contracts20.3%15.7%
ContractsWalletsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
84.3%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking64.1%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell20.3%
  • Everyone else45 holders15.7%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads45.9%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 31, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 31$17.8K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensNot locked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.

Analysed pool$17.8KShare of depth100.0%
Top-1 Unlocked Holder100.0%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%
Unlocked LP held by
0x8984…c449

Security Findings

3 Medium1 Low5 Info
Medium

Centralized Control Over Transfer Functionality

Privileged addresses (factory, rewardHook, rewardLocker) can toggle a switch that determines whether transfers are permitted. This allows these controllers to effectively freeze or unfreeze token movements at will.CP-05

Issue

Privileged addresses (factory, rewardHook, rewardLocker) can toggle a switch that determines whether transfers are permitted. This allows these controllers to effectively freeze or unfreeze token movements at will.

Fix

Implement a timelock for any changes to transfer rules or restrict the ability to pause transfers to a decentralized governance vote.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Privileged Modification of Transfer Fees

The fee structure applied to token transfers can be modified by privileged addresses. This grants controllers the ability to alter the economic incentives of the token without prior notice to holders.CP-07

Issue

The fee structure applied to token transfers can be modified by privileged addresses. This grants controllers the ability to alter the economic incentives of the token without prior notice to holders.

Fix

Define hard caps for transfer fees in the contract code to prevent arbitrary increases by privileged roles.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Liquidity not locked

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0x8984…c449 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0x8984…c449 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Low

Privileged Modification of Transaction Limits

Privileged addresses can change numeric limits such as maximum transaction sizes or wallet thresholds. This could be used to restrict the liquidity or trading behavior of specific users.CP-08

Issue

Privileged addresses can change numeric limits such as maximum transaction sizes or wallet thresholds. This could be used to restrict the liquidity or trading behavior of specific users.

Fix

Document the intended range for these limits and ensure that any changes are communicated to the community via official channels.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 84.3% of supply. What remains: 20.3% in wallets, 64.1% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 8.1%. 55 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 84.3% of supply. What remains: 20.3% in wallets, 64.1% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 8.1%. 55 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

55 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

55 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $18K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $49K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $18K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $49K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $18K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $18K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 31
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

LaunchToken is an EIP-1167 minimal clone implementation featuring integrated holder rewards. The architecture relies on privileged roles (factory, rewardHook, rewardLocker) to manage reward distribution and transfer logic. While the code is well-structured and uses reentrancy guards, the centralization of control over transfer rules and fees presents a significant trust requirement for token holders.

Technical6/10Medium risk

The contract utilizes standard OpenZeppelin-style patterns and EIP-1167 for deployment efficiency. 7.1 Architecture is sound for a clone, and 7.2 Code Security is bolstered by consistent use of nonReentrant modifiers. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via specific roles, though 7.6 External dependencies are limited to standard ERC-20 interactions.

Governance1/10High risk

7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are centralized within the factory and reward-specific roles. Privileged addresses have the power to modify transfer rules and fees, which directly impacts the token's economic utility. Users must trust that these roles will act in the interest of the protocol.

Upgrades5/10Medium risk

7.7 Upgrades are not applicable as the contract is an EIP-1167 minimal clone, which is immutable by design. 7.8 Operations are stable due to this immutability, preventing logic changes post-deployment. The implementation address is fixed, ensuring no future logic shifts.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

Token holders should monitor the activity of the factory and reward-related roles, as these addresses possess significant control over the token's transferability and fee structure.

We recommend transitioning these roles to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to mitigate single-point-of-failure risks. Ensure that all reward funding events are verified on-chain to confirm that the reward pool remains adequately collateralized. The current implementation is secure, but the reliance on centralized controllers necessitates high transparency regarding their operational procedures.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeLaunchToken
NetworkEthereum
Token age10h
Contract0x639b…fbef
Deployer0x9bac…6838
Badge for your website
Senderbot security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 31, 202668High

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Senderbot?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified