LaunchToken is an EIP-1167 minimal clone implementation featuring integrated holder rewards. The architecture relies on privileged roles (factory, rewardHook, rewardLocker) to manage reward distribution and transfer logic. While the code is well-structured and uses reentrancy guards, the centralization of control over transfer rules and fees presents a significant trust requirement for token holders.

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is Senderbot a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →LaunchToken is an EIP-1167 minimal clone implementation featuring integrated holder rewards.
Read the full analysis- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through; held by factory: EOA
- Owner can change the buy/sell tax
- A privileged address can change transfer or wallet limits
- Ownership status UNKNOWN
- Liquidity not locked
- Liquidity < $50k
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through; held by factory: EOA
- Owner can change the buy/sell tax
- A privileged address can change transfer or wallet limits
- Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — who holds it cannot be verified
- Liquidity < $50k ($17,803 across 1 pairs — thin market)
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (84.3% total → 45.9% effective; 20.3% in EOAs, 64.1% in contracts)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 31Holders
as of audit · Oct 31, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking64.1%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell20.3%
- Everyone else45 holders15.7%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 31, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 31The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0x8984…c449Security Findings
MediumCentralized Control Over Transfer Functionality
Privileged addresses (factory, rewardHook, rewardLocker) can toggle a switch that determines whether transfers are permitted. This allows these controllers to effectively freeze or unfreeze token movements at will.CP-05
Issue
Privileged addresses (factory, rewardHook, rewardLocker) can toggle a switch that determines whether transfers are permitted. This allows these controllers to effectively freeze or unfreeze token movements at will.
Fix
Implement a timelock for any changes to transfer rules or restrict the ability to pause transfers to a decentralized governance vote.
Status
Unresolved
MediumPrivileged Modification of Transfer Fees
The fee structure applied to token transfers can be modified by privileged addresses. This grants controllers the ability to alter the economic incentives of the token without prior notice to holders.CP-07
Issue
The fee structure applied to token transfers can be modified by privileged addresses. This grants controllers the ability to alter the economic incentives of the token without prior notice to holders.
Fix
Define hard caps for transfer fees in the contract code to prevent arbitrary increases by privileged roles.
Status
Unresolved
MediumLiquidity not locked
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0x8984…c449 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0x8984…c449 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
LowPrivileged Modification of Transaction Limits
Privileged addresses can change numeric limits such as maximum transaction sizes or wallet thresholds. This could be used to restrict the liquidity or trading behavior of specific users.CP-08
Issue
Privileged addresses can change numeric limits such as maximum transaction sizes or wallet thresholds. This could be used to restrict the liquidity or trading behavior of specific users.
Fix
Document the intended range for these limits and ensure that any changes are communicated to the community via official channels.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 84.3% of supply. What remains: 20.3% in wallets, 64.1% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 8.1%. 55 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 84.3% of supply. What remains: 20.3% in wallets, 64.1% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 8.1%. 55 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
55 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
55 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $18K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $49K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $18K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $49K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $18K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $18K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 31The contract utilizes standard OpenZeppelin-style patterns and EIP-1167 for deployment efficiency. 7.1 Architecture is sound for a clone, and 7.2 Code Security is bolstered by consistent use of nonReentrant modifiers. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via specific roles, though 7.6 External dependencies are limited to standard ERC-20 interactions.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are centralized within the factory and reward-specific roles. Privileged addresses have the power to modify transfer rules and fees, which directly impacts the token's economic utility. Users must trust that these roles will act in the interest of the protocol.
7.7 Upgrades are not applicable as the contract is an EIP-1167 minimal clone, which is immutable by design. 7.8 Operations are stable due to this immutability, preventing logic changes post-deployment. The implementation address is fixed, ensuring no future logic shifts.
Token holders should monitor the activity of the factory and reward-related roles, as these addresses possess significant control over the token's transferability and fee structure.
We recommend transitioning these roles to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to mitigate single-point-of-failure risks. Ensure that all reward funding events are verified on-chain to confirm that the reward pool remains adequately collateralized. The current implementation is secure, but the reliance on centralized controllers necessitates high transparency regarding their operational procedures.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 31, 202668High
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Senderbot?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified