The PangeaOFT contract implements an Omnichain Fungible Token (OFT) standard. The architecture relies on LayerZero for cross-chain messaging and utilizes specific roles for supply reporting and metadata management. While the core logic is standard, the ability for privileged roles to influence supply metrics introduces centralized trust requirements.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is PVE a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The PangeaOFT contract implements an Omnichain Fungible Token (OFT) standard.
Read the full analysis- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by endpoint: Other-Contract, supplyreporter: Other-Contract
- Liquidity not locked
- Liquidity < $50k
- Contract source not verified — its logic cannot be read
Exact factors
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by endpoint: Other-Contract, supplyreporter: Other-Contract
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
- Liquidity < $50k ($18,902 across 1 pairs — thin market)
- Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 22Holders
as of audit · Oct 22, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking12.9%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell1.3%
- Everyone else90 holders85.8%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 22, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 22The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0xa6f3…e168No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.
Security Findings
MediumCentralized Control Over Token Supply
The 'supplyReporter' role and the LayerZero endpoint have the ability to mint tokens or influence supply reporting. This allows these privileged entities to potentially dilute the value of existing token holdings by increasing the total supply.CP-01
Issue
The 'supplyReporter' role and the LayerZero endpoint have the ability to mint tokens or influence supply reporting. This allows these privileged entities to potentially dilute the value of existing token holdings by increasing the total supply.
Fix
Restrict the 'supplyReporter' role to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract. Implement a hard cap on the total supply to prevent excessive minting beyond intended limits.
Status
Unresolved
MediumLiquidity not locked
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0xa6f3…e168 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0xa6f3…e168 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 14.2% of supply. What remains: 1.3% in wallets, 12.9% in other contracts. 100 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 14.2% of supply. What remains: 1.3% in wallets, 12.9% in other contracts. 100 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
100 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
100 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $19K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $150K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $19K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $150K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $19K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $19K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — 1 day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 22The contract follows the established LayerZero OFT standard, ensuring robust cross-chain interoperability. 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security are well-implemented using standard libraries. 7.3 Access Control is enforced via role-based modifiers for sensitive functions like setPeer and setMetadataURI. 7.6 External dependencies are limited to the LayerZero endpoint, which is a trusted component in this architecture.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are centralized. The supplyReporter role has the authority to influence supply reporting, which could impact tokenomics. 7.8 Operations are managed by the owner, who can update critical infrastructure parameters. This centralization requires high trust in the entities holding these roles.
7.7 Upgrades are not implemented via proxy patterns in this contract. The logic is immutable, reducing the risk of unauthorized logic changes. Future changes would require a full contract migration.
The protocol should consider implementing a multi-signature wallet or a timelock controller for the 'supplyReporter' and 'metadataAuthority' roles to mitigate the risk of single-point-of-failure.
Ensure that the addresses assigned to these roles are monitored for unauthorized activity. Regularly audit the LayerZero endpoint configurations to ensure that cross-chain messaging parameters remain secure. Maintain transparency regarding the supply reporting mechanism to ensure token holders are aware of how the total supply is managed.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 22, 202667High
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of PVE?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page