The FlapTaxTokenV3 is an EIP-1167 minimal clone implementation of an ERC-20 token with custom migration and tax logic. The contract utilizes standard OpenZeppelin upgradeable base contracts for initialization, though the clone pattern itself is immutable. No critical vulnerabilities were identified in the provided logic.

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is Safu Inu a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The FlapTaxTokenV3 is an EIP-1167 minimal clone implementation of an ERC-20 token with custom migration and tax logic.
Read the full analysis- Ownership not renounced — the owner keeps admin functions
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Liquidity < $50k
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
- Ownership NOT renounced — the owner keeps admin functions
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Liquidity < $50k ($12,470 across 1 pairs — thin market)
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (74.3% total → 39.3% effective; 15.9% in EOAs, 58.4% in contracts; deployer/owner holds 57.9%)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 30Holders
as of audit · Oct 30, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking58.4%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell15.9%
- Everyone else74 holders25.7%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 30, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 30The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
Security Findings
HighWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 74.3% of supply. What remains: 15.9% in wallets, 58.4% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 57.9%. A holder that also controls the contract can sell into its own liquidity. 84 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 74.3% of supply. What remains: 15.9% in wallets, 58.4% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 57.9%. A holder that also controls the contract can sell into its own liquidity. 84 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNo issues identified in the reviewed source
The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.I-01
Issue
The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.
Fix
Re-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
84 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
84 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $12K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $32K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $12K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $32K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Meme token
A community token whose value comes from attention rather than a product. Being a meme is not a risk in itself: it is scored on exactly the same contract and market facts as any other token. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: meme vocabulary in name/ticker (inu). Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: a role-controlled contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $12K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A community token whose value comes from attention rather than a product. Being a meme is not a risk in itself: it is scored on exactly the same contract and market facts as any other token. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: meme vocabulary in name/ticker (inu). Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: a role-controlled contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $12K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Expect attention-driven volatility; the facts in this report say whether the contract itself can be used against holders.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 30The architecture follows the EIP-1167 standard, ensuring a lightweight and immutable deployment. 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security are robust, utilizing well-audited OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20 and permit functionality. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via the OwnableUpgradeable pattern, ensuring only the owner can trigger migration states. 7.6 External dependencies are minimal and standard.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance risks are centralized under the contract owner. The owner has the authority to trigger migration states, which directly impacts token transfer behavior and tax enforcement. While this allows for protocol evolution, it introduces a single point of failure regarding the token's economic parameters.
7.7 Upgrades are effectively disabled due to the EIP-1167 minimal clone architecture, which points to a fixed implementation address. While the contract uses Initializable base contracts, these are for setup purposes only and do not facilitate future logic changes. 7.8 Operations are stable as the contract logic is locked post-deployment.
The contract is well-structured and follows secure patterns for immutable token deployments.
We recommend that the owner address be transitioned to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to mitigate the risks associated with centralized control over migration and tax parameters. Ensure that all future deployments of this clone follow the same initialization procedures to prevent potential state collision or misconfiguration. No further technical changes are required at this time.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 30, 202644Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the SI contract address?
The Safu Inu (SI) contract on BNB Chain is 0x9e8452c705120488379213bfbb4fc3771e767777. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is Safu Inu a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for Safu Inu is 44/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 30, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: No mint; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Who holds SI?
As of Oct 30, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 74.3% of the supply across 84 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Safu Inu?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified