Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

Is RWA Inc Safe?

RWABase
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 31, 2026 · 1 audit on record
SummaryAI Copilot

The RWAIncToken is an Omnichain Fungible Token (OFT) deployed on Base.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by endpoint: Other-Contract
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the deepest pool's LP could not be read; this pool is 100% of DEX liquidity
  • Liquidity not locked
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by endpoint: Other-Contract
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the deepest pool's LP could not be read; this pool is 100% of DEX liquidity
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool; this pool is 0% of DEX liquidity) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (49.8% total → 30.3% effective; 17.3% in EOAs, 32.4% in contracts)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 314 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRetained
MintMintable
Liquidity lockNot locked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 31, 202673,700 holders
32.4%Contracts17.3%Wallets50.2%Everyone else
32.4%Contracts17.3%50.2%Everyone else
ContractsWalletsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
49.8%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking32.4%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell17.3%
  • Everyone else73,690 holders50.2%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads30.3%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 31, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 31$66.0K across 5 pairs
LP tokensNot locked

The LP tokens of the checked pool, Uniswap v3, are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity. The LP of the deepest pool (99.6% of depth) could not be read, so whether it is locked is unknown.

Checked pool$60Share of depth0.1%
Top-1 Unlocked Holder100.0%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%
Unlocked LP held by
0x5efb…ab5a0xd14b…35f30xe08c…00f30x3903…c52a

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

Security Findings

3 Medium3 Info
Medium

Privileged Minting via Cross-Chain Messaging

The functions 'send', 'lzReceiveSimulate', and 'lzReceive' allow for the minting of new tokens as part of the cross-chain transfer process. This increases the total supply of the token, which could lead to the dilution of existing token holders if the cross-chain messaging endpoint is compromised or misconfigured.CP-01

Issue

The functions 'send', 'lzReceiveSimulate', and 'lzReceive' allow for the minting of new tokens as part of the cross-chain transfer process. This increases the total supply of the token, which could lead to the dilution of existing token holders if the cross-chain messaging endpoint is compromised or misconfigured.

Fix

Implement strict supply caps or circuit breakers to limit the amount of tokens that can be minted via cross-chain operations. Ensure that the LayerZero endpoint is trusted and that the 'setPeer' configuration is strictly managed to prevent unauthorized cross-chain interactions.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Liquidity not locked

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0x5efb…ab5a — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0x5efb…ab5a — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Medium

The market for this token

Liquidity $66K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $123K (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $31K (DexScreener, all pools). CoinGecko's record for this coin: all-time high $0.141 on 2024-12-04; the price is now 99.0731% below it.QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $66K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $123K (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $31K (DexScreener, all pools). CoinGecko's record for this coin: all-time high $0.141 on 2024-12-04; the price is now 99.0731% below it.

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 49.8% of supply. What remains: 17.3% in wallets, 32.4% in other contracts. 73,700 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 49.8% of supply. What remains: 17.3% in wallets, 32.4% in other contracts. 73,700 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Listed, but not independently verified

Listed on CoinGecko as RWA Inc. (RWA), market cap $1M, rank #3064. 73,700 holders.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

Listed on CoinGecko as RWA Inc. (RWA), market cap $1M, rank #3064. 73,700 holders.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a single wallet (EOA). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $66K of DEX liquidity across 5 pools. Launch: 705 days of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a single wallet (EOA). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $66K of DEX liquidity across 5 pools. Launch: 705 days of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 31
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The RWAIncToken is an Omnichain Fungible Token (OFT) deployed on Base. The architecture relies on LayerZero for cross-chain interoperability. While the core ERC-20 implementation is standard, the token includes minting capabilities tied to cross-chain messaging, which introduces specific risks regarding supply inflation and endpoint trust.

Technical8/10Low risk

The contract utilizes a robust LayerZero OFT architecture, ensuring standard ERC-20 compliance and cross-chain compatibility. 7.1 Architecture is well-structured using established OApp patterns. 7.2 Code Security is high due to the use of audited libraries. 7.6 External dependencies are limited to the LayerZero endpoint, which is the primary trust assumption for cross-chain operations.

Governance2/10High risk

7.4 Economic risks are centered on the minting mechanism inherent in the OFT standard. 7.5 Governance is currently centralized under an EOA, allowing the owner to modify peers and enforced options. This centralization poses a risk if the owner key is compromised, as it could disrupt cross-chain liquidity.

Upgrades3/10High risk

7.7 Upgrades are not applicable as the contract is not a proxy. The logic is immutable, which provides security against hidden logic changes but prevents patching vulnerabilities post-deployment. The owner retains control over configuration parameters like peers and delegates.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

It is recommended to transition the ownership of the contract to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to mitigate single-point-of-failure risks.

Additionally, monitor the LayerZero endpoint and peer configurations closely to ensure that cross-chain minting parameters remain within expected bounds. Ensure that all administrative actions are logged and that the owner address is secured with hardware-based multi-factor authentication. Regularly audit the configuration of the 'enforcedOptions' to prevent potential denial-of-service or fee-related issues in cross-chain transfers.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeRWAIncToken
NetworkBase
Token age1y
Contract0xe2b1…b35a
Deployer0x0af9…6b40
Badge for your website
RWA Inc security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 31, 202650Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the RWA contract address?

The RWA Inc (RWA) contract on Base is 0xe2b1dc2d4a3b4e59fdf0c47b71a7a86391a8b35a. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is RWA Inc a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for RWA Inc is 50/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 31, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Is RWA liquidity locked?

Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 31, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $66.0K.

Who holds RWA?

As of Oct 31, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 49.8% of the supply across 73,700 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of RWA Inc?

Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified