Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

Is Real Token Safe?

RTBNB Chain
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Nov 1, 2026 · 1 audit on record
SummaryAI Copilot

The RT contract is a standard ERC-20 token implementation utilizing OpenZeppelin libraries.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Liquidity not locked
  • Liquidity < $50k
  • Top-10 concentration > 70%
Exact factors
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
  • Liquidity < $50k ($23,196 across 1 pairs — thin market)
  • Top-10 concentration > 70% (100.0% total → 99.9% effective; 99.9% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Security Checklist

as of audit · Nov 15 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipUnknown
MintNo mint
Liquidity lockNot locked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Nov 1, 202611,734 holders
99.9%Wallets
99.9%Wallets
WalletsBubble area = share of supply
100.0%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell99.9%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads99.9%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 1, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Nov 1$23.2K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensNot locked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.

Analysed pool$23.2KShare of depth100.0%
Top-1 Unlocked Holder100.0%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%
Unlocked LP held by
0x6cee…9d29

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

Security Findings

1 Medium6 Info
Medium

Liquidity not locked

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0x6cee…9d29 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0x6cee…9d29 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

No issues identified in the reviewed source

The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.I-01

Issue

The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.

Fix

Re-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. What remains: 99.9% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. 11,734 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. What remains: 99.9% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. 11,734 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Listed, but not independently verified

Listed on CoinGecko as RealGo (RT). 11,734 holders.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

Listed on CoinGecko as RealGo (RT). 11,734 holders.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $23K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $3.4M (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $127K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $23K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $3.4M (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $127K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $23K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 10 days of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $23K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 10 days of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — 10 days of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is 10 days old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is 10 days old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 1
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The RT contract is a standard ERC-20 token implementation utilizing OpenZeppelin libraries. It includes EIP-2612 permit functionality and burnable capabilities. No privileged roles or administrative backdoors were identified in the source code.

Technical8/10Low risk

The architecture follows standard OpenZeppelin ERC-20 patterns (7.1 Architecture). Code security is robust due to the use of audited, battle-tested libraries (7.2 Code Security). Access control is non-existent as the contract is permissionless (7.3 Access Control). External dependencies are limited to standard EIP interfaces (7.6 External).

Governance2/10High risk

There are no governance mechanisms or economic parameters defined within the contract (7.4 Economic, 7.5 Governance). The token supply is fixed upon deployment or managed via standard mint/burn logic. Operations are fully decentralized as there is no administrative control (7.8 Operations).

Upgrades8/10Low risk

The contract is not upgradeable (7.7 Upgrades). It is a standard immutable deployment. No proxy patterns are utilized.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The contract is secure and follows industry best practices for standard tokens.

No further action is required for the current implementation. Ensure that any future integrations or extensions maintain the current permissionless nature of the contract to avoid introducing centralized points of failure.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkBNB Chain
Token age10d
Contract0xd24b…a562
Deployer0x0560…e126
Badge for your website
Real Token security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Nov 1, 202654Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Real Token?

Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified