Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

Is Portal To Bitcoin Safe?

PTBBNB Chain
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 24, 2026 · 1 audit on record
SummaryAI Copilot

PortalToken is a standard ERC-20 token implementation with bridge-based minting capabilities.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Owner can change any holder's balance
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by bridge: Multisig
  • Liquidity not locked
  • Liquidity < $50k
  • Top-10 concentration > 50%
Exact factors
  • Owner can change any holder's balance (seize or credit tokens)
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by bridge: Multisig
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool; this pool is 62% of DEX liquidity) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
  • Liquidity < $50k ($36,583 across 5 pairs — thin market)
  • Top-10 concentration > 50% (73.8% total → 51.1% effective; 39.1% in EOAs, 30.0% in contracts; 4.7% burned, locked or in pools excluded)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 244 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRetained
MintMintable
Liquidity lockNot locked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 24, 202635,046 holders
30.0%Contracts39.1%Wallets4.7%26.2%Everyone else
30.0%Contracts39.1%Wallets4.7%26.2%Everyone else
ContractsWalletsDEX poolsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
73.8%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking30.0%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell39.1%
  • DEX poolsthe pools' own liquidity4.7%
  • Everyone else35,036 holders26.2%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads51.1%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 24, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 24$36.6K across 5 pairs
LP tokensNot locked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.

Analysed pool$22.6KShare of depth61.7%
Top-1 Unlocked Holder85.4%
Top-3 Unlocked96.4%
Unlocked LP held by
0xf949…02980x59ef…a28e0xce94…07ca0xe731…23560x2aa8…fb1f0x3282…c7f00xc3a9…f5f60x80b8…2d8d0xb08e…43030xcc04…50cb

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

Security Findings

3 Medium3 Info
Medium

Centralized Minting Authority

The mint(address,uint256) function allows a privileged bridge address to create new tokens at will. This capability can lead to the dilution of existing token holder value if the bridge address is compromised or acts maliciously.CP-01

Issue

The mint(address,uint256) function allows a privileged bridge address to create new tokens at will. This capability can lead to the dilution of existing token holder value if the bridge address is compromised or acts maliciously.

Fix

Implement a multi-signature requirement or a time-lock mechanism for the bridge address to restrict the ability to mint tokens. Additionally, consider setting a hard cap on the total supply to limit potential inflationary impact.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Liquidity not locked

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 99.1% is held, unlocked, by 10 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0xf949…0298 — holds 85.4% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 62% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 99.1% is held, unlocked, by 10 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0xf949…0298 — holds 85.4% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 62% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Medium

The market for this token

Liquidity $37K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $8.7M (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $156K (DexScreener, all pools). CoinGecko's record for this coin: all-time high $0.0816 on 2025-09-08; the price is now 99.6552% below it.QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $37K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $8.7M (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $156K (DexScreener, all pools). CoinGecko's record for this coin: all-time high $0.0816 on 2025-09-08; the price is now 99.6552% below it.

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 73.8% of supply. Of that, 4.7% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 39.1% in wallets, 30.0% in other contracts. 35,046 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 73.8% of supply. Of that, 4.7% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 39.1% in wallets, 30.0% in other contracts. 35,046 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Listed, but not independently verified

Listed on CoinGecko as Portal to Bitcoin (PTB), rank #3468. 35,046 holders.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

Listed on CoinGecko as Portal to Bitcoin (PTB), rank #3468. 35,046 holders.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a 2-of-3 multisig. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $37K of DEX liquidity across 5 pools. Launch: 417 days of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a 2-of-3 multisig. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $37K of DEX liquidity across 5 pools. Launch: 417 days of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 24
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

PortalToken is a standard ERC-20 token implementation with bridge-based minting capabilities. The contract utilizes OpenZeppelin's Ownable and ERC20 standards, ensuring robust base functionality. The primary security consideration is the centralized control over token supply via the bridge address.

Technical6/10Medium risk

The architecture follows standard ERC-20 patterns with 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security adhering to industry best practices. 7.3 Access Control is implemented via Ownable, restricting administrative actions to the owner. 7.6 External interactions are limited to the bridge address, minimizing the attack surface.

Governance1/10High risk

7.4 Economic risks are centered on the minting authority held by the bridge. 7.5 Governance is currently centralized under a multisig wallet, providing a balance between security and operational agility. The economic model relies on the integrity of the bridge address to prevent unauthorized supply inflation.

Upgrades4/10Medium risk

7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy. 7.8 Operations are straightforward, with the owner having the ability to rotate the bridge address if necessary. No complex upgrade paths exist to introduce hidden vulnerabilities.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The protocol should ensure that the bridge address is secured by a multi-signature wallet or a time-locked contract to prevent single-point-of-failure risks.

Regular monitoring of the bridge address activity is recommended to detect any anomalous minting events.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypePortalToken
NetworkBNB Chain
Token age1y
Contract0x95c9…9201
Deployer0x60e4…c8ac
Badge for your website
Portal To Bitcoin security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 24, 202667High

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the PTB contract address?

The Portal To Bitcoin (PTB) contract on BNB Chain is 0x95c9b514566fbd224dc2037f5914eb8ab91c9201. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is Portal To Bitcoin a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for Portal To Bitcoin is 67/100 (High risk) as of Oct 24, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Is PTB liquidity locked?

Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 24, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $36.6K.

Who holds PTB?

As of Oct 24, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 73.8% of the supply across 35,046 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Portal To Bitcoin?

Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page