Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is Pepe6900 a Scam?

PEPE6900Ethereum
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 23, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 3h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The PEPE6900 contract is a standard ERC-20 token implementation.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Liquidity < $50k
Exact factors
  • Liquidity < $50k ($39,484 across 1 pairs — thin market)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (3h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 236 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipUnknown
MintNo mint
Liquidity lockLocked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 23, 2026338 holders
5.9%Wallets12.0%DEX pools82.1%Everyone else
5.9%12.0%82.1%Everyone else
WalletsDEX poolsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
17.9%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell5.9%
  • DEX poolsthe pools' own liquidity12.0%
  • Everyone else328 holders82.1%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads5.9%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 23, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 23$39.5K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensLocked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.

Analysed pool$39.5KShare of depth100.0%
LP Locked100.0% · TeamFinance

Security Findings

7 Info
Info

No issues identified in the reviewed source

The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint capability, LP lock/burn state, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.I-01

Issue

The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint capability, LP lock/burn state, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.

Fix

Re-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 17.9% of supply. Of that, 12.0% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 5.9% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. 338 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 17.9% of supply. Of that, 12.0% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 5.9% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. 338 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

338 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

338 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Liquidity locked, lock term not visible

100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held by TeamFinance, but the lock's end date is not published in the data we can read — its duration is unverified. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held by TeamFinance, but the lock's end date is not published in the data we can read — its duration is unverified. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $39K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $302K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $39K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $302K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Meme token

A community token whose value comes from attention rather than a product. Being a meme is not a risk in itself: it is scored on exactly the same contract and market facts as any other token. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: meme vocabulary in name/ticker (pepe). Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $39K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A community token whose value comes from attention rather than a product. Being a meme is not a risk in itself: it is scored on exactly the same contract and market facts as any other token. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: meme vocabulary in name/ticker (pepe). Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $39K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Expect attention-driven volatility; the facts in this report say whether the contract itself can be used against holders.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 23
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The PEPE6900 contract is a standard ERC-20 token implementation. The codebase is clean, follows OpenZeppelin standards, and contains no privileged administrative functions or complex logic that could lead to centralization risks or unexpected state changes.

Technical10/10Low risk

The architecture follows standard ERC-20 patterns (7.1 Architecture). Code security is high due to the use of audited OpenZeppelin libraries (7.2 Code Security). There are no access control vulnerabilities as the contract lacks administrative functions (7.3 Access Control).

Governance9/10Low risk

There are no economic mechanisms such as taxes, minting, or burning (7.4 Economic). Governance is non-existent as there are no administrative controls (7.5 Governance). The contract does not interact with external protocols (7.6 External).

Upgrades10/10Low risk

The contract is not upgradeable (7.7 Upgrades). Operations are straightforward and rely solely on standard ERC-20 functionality (7.8 Operations).

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The contract is secure and functions as a standard ERC-20 token.

No further action is required as there are no identified vulnerabilities.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkEthereum
Token age3h
Contract0x4363…3895
Deployer0xc3de…0e3b
Badge for your website
Pepe6900 security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 23, 202617Low

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Pepe6900?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page