Quantum Audit Logo

Is Engram a Scam?

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page →

Engram ENGRAM
0x56c9…7cc6
Ethereum
Not verifiedThis record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked today 1 audit on record New Launch · 1d old
DexScreener ↗
How is this score calculated? → Low Risk
Executive SummaryAI Copilot

The Engram contract functions as a basic token, implementing core transfer functionalities. No critical or high-severity vulnerabilities were identified during the audit. The contract exhibits a simple architecture with no complex access control or upgrade mechanisms. However, it lacks several standard ERC-20 functions, which may impact its compatibility and usability within the broader ecosystem.

1 Medium6 Informational
! Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (1d old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.
Volume 24h
$420.6K
Liquidity
$75.5K
Price
$0.0005843
Token Age
1d
Top 10 Holders
34.7%

Security Findings

1 Med6 Info
Medium

Liquidity not locked

QA-LIQUIDITY0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0x7ad8…3acd — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 66% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.
Issue0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0x7ad8…3acd — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 66% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.
FixCheck the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

No issues identified in the reviewed source

I-01The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.
IssueThe verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.
FixRe-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Who holds the supply

QA-HOLDERSThe ten largest holders own 34.7% of supply. What remains: 6.9% in wallets, 27.7% in other contracts. 344 holders in total.
IssueThe ten largest holders own 34.7% of supply. What remains: 6.9% in wallets, 27.7% in other contracts. 344 holders in total.
FixWatch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Not listed by any independent source

QA-IDENTITY344 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Issue344 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
FixMatch the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

The market for this token

QA-MARKETLiquidity $114K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $492K (DexScreener, all pools).
IssueLiquidity $114K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $492K (DexScreener, all pools).
FixSize any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Asset class: Project token

QA-PROFILEA token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $114K of DEX liquidity across 7 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.
IssueA token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $114K of DEX liquidity across 7 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.
FixCheck the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Recently launched — 1 day of market history

QA-RECENTThe token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
IssueThe token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
FixRe-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalLow10/10

The Engram contract (7.1 Architecture) implements basic token transfer logic via `transfer` and `transferFrom` functions, demonstrating a straightforward design. There are no privileged functions or complex state variables that control transfers, simplifying the access control model (7.3 Access Control). However, the contract is missing several standard ERC-20 functions such as `totalSupply()`, `balanceOf(address)`, and `allowance(address,address)`, which could lead to compatibility issues (7.2 Code Security).

GovernanceHigh2/10

The Engram contract does not incorporate any governance mechanisms (7.5 Governance) or complex economic models (7.4 Economic). This simplicity reduces the attack surface associated with intricate protocol interactions or decision-making processes. The absence of such features means there are no associated economic or governance risks to assess.

UpgradesLow8/10

The Engram contract is not designed as an upgradeable proxy (7.7 Upgrades). This eliminates all risks associated with upgrade mechanisms, such as proxy initialization errors, storage collisions, or insecure upgrade paths. The contract's immutability ensures its logic remains constant post-deployment.

Security Checklist

3/5 checks passed
Contract VerifiedPass
Ownership Renounced?
No Mint FunctionPass
Liquidity LockedFail
Not a ProxyPass
HoneypotNoneBuy Tax0.0%Sell Tax0.0%

Holder Composition

34.7% in top 10
6.9% in wallets27.7% in contracts
Effective Concentration18.0%

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Liquidity Depth

$113.7K across 7 pairs
Uniswap v4ETHanalysed$75.5K66.4%Uniswap v4ETH$12.9K11.4%Uniswap v4USDC$12.7K11.1%Uniswap v4ETH$6.7K5.9%Uniswap v4USDC$5.3K4.6%Uniswap v4USDC$5130.5%
Show 1 more pairShow less
Uniswap v4ETH$1320.1%

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

LP Distribution

Top-1 Unlocked Holder100.0%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%

Key Addresses

2 addresses
Deployer
0x9bd7…6494
Unlocked LP Held By
0x7ad8…3acd

What Raised This Score

1 factors
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool; this pool is 66% of DEX liquidity) — who holds it cannot be verified

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Related Audits

6 more on the record
Ethereumcat (ETHCAT)Low RiskJasmyCoin (JASMY)Low RiskManyuLow RiskRektLow RiskXEN Crypto (XEN)Low RiskPepes Dog (ZEUS)Low Risk

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Engram?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit