Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is OFFLINE RESEARCH a Scam?

OFFRBase

Not verified

This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →

Last checked Nov 1, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 2h old

Chart

82/ 100

High RiskHow is this score calculated?

How the score breaks downratings: 10 is safest

Technical6/10 Governance1/10 Upgrades6/10 Checks passed5 of 7 Findings3 Medium · 5 Info8

SummaryAI Copilot

The DopplerERC20V1 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with governance voting capabilities, deployed as an EIP-1167 minimal clone.

Read the full analysis

What raised the score

Owner can pause all transfers
A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through; held by controller: EOA
Liquidity not locked
Liquidity < $50k
Top-10 concentration > 30%
Code: Locked ETH in Contract
The deployer has launched a honeypot before

Exact factors

Owner can pause all transfers
A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through; held by controller: EOA
Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
Liquidity < $50k ($38,387 across 2 pairs — thin market)
Top-10 concentration > 30% (86.9% total → 42.1% effective; 12.2% in EOAs, 74.7% in contracts)
Code: Locked ETH in Contract (Medium, static analysis)
The deployer has launched a honeypot before

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (2h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Nov 15 of 7 checks passed

Contract verifiedVerified

OwnershipRetained

MintNo mint

Liquidity lockNot locked

UpgradeabilityFixed code

HoneypotNone found

Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Nov 1, 202689 holders

ContractsWalletsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply

86.9%of supply sits with the top 10 holders

Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking74.7%
Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell12.2%
Everyone else79 holders13.1%

Effective concentrationwhat the score reads42.1%

How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 1, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Nov 1$38.4K across 2 pairs

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensNot locked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.

Analysed pool$38.4KShare of depth100.0%

Top-1 Unlocked Holder75.3%

Top-3 Unlocked100.0%

Unlocked LP held by

0x511a…ac0c0xa6f3…e168

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

Security Findings

3 Medium5 Info

Medium

Locked ETH in Contract

The contract is capable of receiving ETH but lacks any function to withdraw or transfer it out. Any ETH sent to the contract address will be permanently locked.CD-01

Issue

The contract is capable of receiving ETH but lacks any function to withdraw or transfer it out. Any ETH sent to the contract address will be permanently locked.

Fix

Add an owner-restricted function to withdraw ETH from the contract to prevent permanent loss of funds.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Centralized Control Over Token Transfers

The owner and controller have the ability to toggle transfer restrictions and lock liquidity pools via functions like lockPool, unlockPool, and disableBalanceLimit. This allows the administrator to unilaterally halt trading or restrict user access to their tokens.CP-05

Issue

Fix

Implement a timelock for all administrative functions that modify transfer rules to provide users with notice before changes take effect.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Liquidity not locked

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 2 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0x511a…ac0c — holds 75.3% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 86.9% of supply. What remains: 12.2% in wallets, 74.7% in other contracts. 89 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 86.9% of supply. What remains: 12.2% in wallets, 74.7% in other contracts. 89 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

89 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

89 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $38K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $76K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $38K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $76K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Governance token

A token whose main use is voting on a protocol's decisions (delegation and vote checkpoints in its code). The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: vote delegation in its code. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $38K of DEX liquidity across 2 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

Fix

Check how much of the voting supply insiders hold and what governance can change.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 1

Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The DopplerERC20V1 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with governance voting capabilities, deployed as an EIP-1167 minimal clone. The contract implements centralized control mechanisms over transfer logic and balance limits. While the code is structurally sound and follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the presence of administrative switches that can halt transfers or modify token rules introduces significant centralization risk. Additionally, the contract lacks a mechanism to recover accidentally sent ETH.

Technical6/10Medium risk

The contract utilizes well-tested OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20 and governance functionality. 7.1 Architecture: EIP-1167 clone pattern ensures immutable logic. 7.2 Code Security: Logic is clean and follows standard patterns. 7.3 Access Control: Roles are clearly defined, though highly centralized. 7.6 External: No external dependencies that pose immediate risk.

Governance1/10High risk

7.4 Economic: The token includes balance limits and pool locking mechanisms. 7.5 Governance: The owner holds significant power to restrict liquidity and modify token behavior. These controls allow for potential market manipulation or user fund freezing. The economic model relies heavily on the integrity of the owner/controller.

Upgrades6/10Medium risk

7.7 Upgrades: The contract is an EIP-1167 minimal clone, meaning the implementation logic is fixed and cannot be upgraded. 7.8 Operations: Administrative functions are restricted to the owner or controller. No upgrade path exists, which mitigates risks associated with malicious implementation updates.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The protocol should consider implementing a multi-signature wallet or a timelock contract for the owner address to mitigate the risks associated with centralized control over transfer logic.

This would provide transparency and prevent unilateral actions by a single compromised key. Furthermore, adding a function to withdraw accidentally sent ETH would improve the contract's robustness and prevent permanent loss of funds. Ensure that all administrative actions are logged and monitored to maintain accountability.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record

TypeProxy, Token

NetworkBase

Token age2h

Contract0xee90…1ba3

Deployer0x3f0f…59a1

Badge for your website

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History

Nov 1, 202682High

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the OFFR contract address?

The OFFLINE RESEARCH (OFFR) contract on Base is 0xee9069e8f520652e59674fad2120f6dea2671ba3. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.