The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer. Consequently, the source code is unavailable for security analysis. Investors should exercise extreme caution as the lack of transparency prevents verification of ownership, tax mechanisms, or potential backdoors.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is Launch a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer.
Read the full analysis- Mint capability UNKNOWN
- Ownership status UNKNOWN
- Liquidity not locked
- Top-10 concentration > 20%
- Contract source not verified — its logic cannot be read
Exact factors
- Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
- Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — withdrawable by the owner/deployer — rug-pull risk
- Top-10 concentration > 20% (34.6% total → 24.7% effective; 18.1% in EOAs, 16.5% in contracts)
- Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 26Holders
as of audit · Oct 26, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking16.5%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell18.1%
- Everyone else834 holders65.4%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 26, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 26The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0x990d…f768A privileged address — the deployer, the owner, or the token contract itself — is among these holders, so that party can withdraw liquidity.
Security Findings
CriticalUnverified Source Code
The contract source code is not verified on the block explorer, making it impossible to audit the logic, security, or ownership structure.C-01
Issue
The contract source code is not verified on the block explorer, making it impossible to audit the logic, security, or ownership structure.
Fix
Verify the source code on the block explorer to allow for community and security review.
Status
Unresolved
HighLiquidity withdrawable by the owner/deployer
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by the token's owner/deployer (0x990d…f768) — they can pull that liquidity at any moment. This is the rug-pull path. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by the token's owner/deployer (0x990d…f768) — they can pull that liquidity at any moment. This is the rug-pull path. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 34.6% of supply. What remains: 18.1% in wallets, 16.5% in other contracts. 844 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 34.6% of supply. What remains: 18.1% in wallets, 16.5% in other contracts. 844 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
844 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
844 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $121K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.2M (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $121K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.2M (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $121K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $121K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 26The technical architecture cannot be assessed due to the lack of verified source code. 7.1 Architecture, 7.2 Code Security, and 7.3 Access Control remain entirely opaque. Without bytecode analysis, it is impossible to determine if the contract contains standard ERC-20 functions or malicious logic. Users must assume the highest level of technical risk.
Economic parameters such as 7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance mechanisms are hidden from public view. There is no visibility into minting capabilities, transfer taxes, or liquidity lock status. Investors are unable to verify if the contract owner has the ability to manipulate supply or restrict trading.
The contract's 7.7 Upgrades status is unknown, meaning it could potentially be a proxy contract or contain hidden upgradeability features. 7.8 Operations are also unverified, leaving the protocol's long-term sustainability and security maintenance completely uncertain. No reliance should be placed on the contract's immutability.
Do not interact with this contract. The absence of verified source code is a major red flag that prevents any meaningful security assessment.
Without transparency, there is no way to ensure the safety of funds or the integrity of the contract's logic.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 26, 202682High
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the LAUNCH contract address?
The Launch contract on Base is 0x55048e63089741620f5d4a442cacedce2059ee5a. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is Launch a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for Launch is 82/100 (High risk) as of Oct 26, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Not verified; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Is LAUNCH liquidity locked?
Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 26, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $121.5K.
Who holds LAUNCH?
As of Oct 26, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 34.6% of the supply across 844 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Launch?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page