The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer. As the source code is unavailable, it is impossible to perform a technical security audit or verify the contract's logic, ownership structure, or tax mechanisms. Investors should exercise extreme caution as unverified contracts often lack transparency and may contain malicious functions.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is Nado a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer.
Read the full analysis- Mint capability UNKNOWN
- Ownership status UNKNOWN
- Liquidity not locked
- Top-10 concentration > 70%
- Contract source not verified — its logic cannot be read
Exact factors
- Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
- Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — who holds it cannot be verified
- Top-10 concentration > 70% (89.7% total → 78.1% effective; 70.3% in EOAs, 19.4% in contracts)
- Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 29Holders
as of audit · Oct 29, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking19.4%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell70.3%
- Everyone else1,736 holders10.3%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 29, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 29The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0xf3fd…a64aSecurity Findings
CriticalUnverified Source Code
The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, preventing any security analysis.C-01
Issue
The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, preventing any security analysis.
Fix
Publish and verify the source code on the block explorer to allow for community and security review.
Status
Unresolved
HighOpaque Administrative Controls
Without code visibility, it is impossible to determine if the contract owner has excessive privileges such as pausing, minting, or blacklisting.H-01
Issue
Without code visibility, it is impossible to determine if the contract owner has excessive privileges such as pausing, minting, or blacklisting.
Fix
Renounce ownership or move administrative functions to a multi-sig or timelock contract if applicable.
Status
Unresolved
MediumPotential Malicious Logic
Unverified contracts frequently contain hidden logic to restrict selling or drain user funds.M-01
Issue
Unverified contracts frequently contain hidden logic to restrict selling or drain user funds.
Fix
Perform a thorough audit of the contract logic before any capital deployment.
Status
Unresolved
MediumLiquidity not locked
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0xf3fd…a64a — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0xf3fd…a64a — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 89.7% of supply. What remains: 70.3% in wallets, 19.4% in other contracts. 1,746 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 89.7% of supply. What remains: 70.3% in wallets, 19.4% in other contracts. 1,746 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
1,746 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
1,746 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $73K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $139K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $73K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $139K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $73K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $73K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 297.1 Architecture: Unknown. 7.2 Code Security: Cannot be verified due to lack of source code. 7.3 Access Control: Cannot be verified; potential for hidden backdoors or owner-only functions. 7.6 External: Interactions with external protocols cannot be audited.
7.4 Economic: Tokenomics and tax logic are opaque. 7.5 Governance: Voting mechanisms or administrative controls are hidden. 7.8 Operations: Operational security cannot be assessed without code visibility.
7.7 Upgrades: It is unknown if the contract is immutable or utilizes a proxy pattern. Without source code, there is no way to determine if the contract logic can be altered post-deployment.
Do not interact with or provide liquidity to this contract until the source code is verified on the block explorer and audited by a reputable third party.
The lack of transparency is a significant indicator of potential risk, including honeypot mechanisms or rug-pull vectors.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 29, 202680High
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the NADO contract address?
The Nado contract on Base is 0x22376a6848b792fa032aa74fe2c6d461c49973be. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is Nado a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for Nado is 80/100 (High risk) as of Oct 29, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Not verified; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Is NADO liquidity locked?
Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 29, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $73.3K.
Who holds NADO?
As of Oct 29, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 89.7% of the supply across 1,746 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Nado?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified