Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

Is MUX Protocol Safe?

MCBArbitrum
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 26, 2026 · 1 audit on record
SummaryAI Copilot

The ArbMCBv2 contract is an upgradeable ERC-20 token implementation on Arbitrum designed for cross-chain bridging.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Owner can change any holder's balance
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by gateway: Other-Contract
  • Upgradeable proxy — the admin can replace the logic; admin: ProxyAdmin -> Multisig
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN
  • Liquidity not locked
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
  • Owner can change any holder's balance (seize or credit tokens); held by gateway: Other-Contract
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by gateway: Other-Contract
  • Upgradeable proxy — the admin can replace the logic; admin: ProxyAdmin -> Multisig
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool; this pool is 97% of DEX liquidity) — who holds it cannot be verified
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (85.7% total → 38.6% effective; 9.5% in EOAs, 72.9% in contracts; 3.4% burned, locked or in pools excluded)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 263 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipUnknown
MintMintable
Liquidity lockNot locked
UpgradeabilityUpgradeable
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 26, 20265,897 holders
72.9%Contracts9.5%Wallets3.4%14.3%Everyone else
72.9%Contracts9.5%3.4%14.3%Everyone else
ContractsWalletsDEX poolsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
85.7%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking72.9%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell9.5%
  • DEX poolsthe pools' own liquidity3.4%
  • Everyone else5,887 holders14.3%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads38.6%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 26, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 26$654.8K across 3 pairs
LP tokensNot locked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.

Analysed pool$635.7KShare of depth97.1%
Top-1 Unlocked Holder100.0%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%
Unlocked LP held by
0xc2d2…bebb0x1c1d…e3ad0xdfb6…cfc5

Security Findings

1 High2 Medium4 Info
High

Privileged Balance Manipulation

The bridgeBurn function allows the bridge gateway to directly reduce the balance of any user address. This grants the controller the power to remove tokens from any holder's wallet.CP-02

Issue

The bridgeBurn function allows the bridge gateway to directly reduce the balance of any user address. This grants the controller the power to remove tokens from any holder's wallet.

Fix

Restrict the ability to burn tokens to the user's own address or implement a circuit breaker that prevents mass-burning of user funds.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Privileged Minting Capability

The functions bridgeMint and mint allow authorized addresses to create new tokens. This increases the total supply and dilutes the value of existing holdings.CP-01

Issue

The functions bridgeMint and mint allow authorized addresses to create new tokens. This increases the total supply and dilutes the value of existing holdings.

Fix

Implement a hard cap on the total supply or require a multi-step governance process for any minting operations to prevent unauthorized supply expansion.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Liquidity not locked

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0xc2d2…bebb — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0xc2d2…bebb — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 85.7% of supply. Of that, 3.4% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 9.5% in wallets, 72.9% in other contracts. 5,897 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 85.7% of supply. Of that, 3.4% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 9.5% in wallets, 72.9% in other contracts. 5,897 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Listed, but not independently verified

Listed on CoinGecko as MUX Protocol (MCB), market cap $6M, rank #1472. 5,897 holders.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

Listed on CoinGecko as MUX Protocol (MCB), market cap $6M, rank #1472. 5,897 holders.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $655K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $38K (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $89K (DexScreener, all pools). CoinGecko's record for this coin: all-time high $68.36 on 2021-10-16; the price is now 97.5033% below it.QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $655K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $38K (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $89K (DexScreener, all pools). CoinGecko's record for this coin: all-time high $68.36 on 2021-10-16; the price is now 97.5033% below it.

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Wrapped or bridged asset

A token representing another asset's units 1:1, backed by a wrapping contract, a custodian or a bridge. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: bridge-mint functions in its code. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: upgradeable proxy. Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $655K of DEX liquidity across 3 pools. Launch: 1507 days of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token representing another asset's units 1:1, backed by a wrapping contract, a custodian or a bridge. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: bridge-mint functions in its code. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: upgradeable proxy. Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $655K of DEX liquidity across 3 pools. Launch: 1507 days of market history.

Fix

The backing is the risk: check who holds the underlying asset and how redemption works.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 26
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The ArbMCBv2 contract is an upgradeable ERC-20 token implementation on Arbitrum designed for cross-chain bridging. The architecture relies on centralized roles and gateway permissions to manage supply and cross-chain synchronization. While the core token logic is standard, the presence of privileged functions that can manipulate user balances and total supply introduces significant centralization risks.

Technical7/10Low risk

The contract utilizes OpenZeppelin's upgradeable standards (7.1 Architecture) and follows standard ERC-20 patterns (7.2 Code Security). The implementation is clean and leverages established libraries for access control (7.3 Access Control). However, the reliance on external L1/L2 messaging (7.6 External) requires high trust in the bridge gateway configuration.

Governance1/10High risk

Economic control is centralized within the bridge gateway and designated minter roles (7.4 Economic). Governance (7.5 Governance) is managed via a multisig proxy admin, providing a layer of protection against single-point-of-failure. The ability to mint or burn tokens at will (7.8 Operations) represents a significant trust requirement for token holders.

Upgrades1/10High risk

The contract employs a Transparent Proxy pattern (7.7 Upgrades) managed by a multisig wallet. This setup allows for secure, controlled updates to the logic contract. The upgrade process is transparent and requires a 4-of-8 multisig threshold, mitigating risks of malicious logic injection.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

Token holders should be aware that the protocol administrators possess the technical capability to alter the total supply and individual user balances.

It is recommended that the protocol transition to a decentralized governance model or implement time-locks on privileged functions to increase transparency and trust. Ensure that the multisig signers are geographically and organizationally distributed to prevent collusion. Regular monitoring of the bridge gateway activity is advised to detect any unauthorized or anomalous minting/burning events.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeTransparentUpgradeableProxy
NetworkArbitrum
Token age4y
Contract0x4e35…ce42
Deployer0x904b…667c
Proxy Upgrade Controls
Proxy TypeEip1967 Transparent
AdminOZ ProxyAdmin → Multisig 4-of-8
ImplementationVerified source
Upgrades (30d)0 · stable
Badge for your website
MUX Protocol security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 26, 202664Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the MCB contract address?

The MUX Protocol (MCB) contract on Arbitrum is 0x4e352cf164e64adcbad318c3a1e222e9eba4ce42. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is MUX Protocol a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for MUX Protocol is 64/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 26, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Mint: Mintable; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Upgradeable; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Is MCB liquidity locked?

Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 26, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $654.8K.

Who holds MCB?

As of Oct 26, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 85.7% of the supply across 5,897 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of MUX Protocol?

Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified