The MAMESUKE contract is a standard ERC-20 token implementation. The architecture is simple and lacks complex administrative controls or upgradeability features. The primary concern identified is a logic inconsistency regarding return values in transfer functions, which may impact integration with certain DeFi protocols.

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is MAMESUKE a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The MAMESUKE contract is a standard ERC-20 token implementation.
Read the full analysis- Liquidity < $50k
- Code: Inconsistent Return Values in Transfer Functions
Exact factors
- Liquidity < $50k ($37,349 across 1 pairs — thin market)
- Code: Inconsistent Return Values in Transfer Functions (High, static analysis)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Nov 3Holders
as of audit · Nov 3, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking15.6%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell11.4%
- Everyone else227 holders73.0%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 3, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Nov 3The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.
Security Findings
HighInconsistent Return Values in Transfer Functions
The internal _transfer function and related transfer/transferFrom methods do not correctly handle return values as expected by some automated DeFi protocols. This can cause transactions to fail or be misinterpreted by external smart contracts that rely on strict ERC-20 return standards.CD-01
Issue
The internal _transfer function and related transfer/transferFrom methods do not correctly handle return values as expected by some automated DeFi protocols. This can cause transactions to fail or be misinterpreted by external smart contracts that rely on strict ERC-20 return standards.
Fix
Ensure that all transfer functions explicitly return a boolean value as defined by the ERC-20 standard and that the internal logic correctly propagates these values to the caller.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 27.0% of supply. What remains: 11.4% in wallets, 15.6% in other contracts. 237 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 27.0% of supply. What remains: 11.4% in wallets, 15.6% in other contracts. 237 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
237 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
237 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoLiquidity burned — cannot be withdrawn
100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $37K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $303K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $37K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $303K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $37K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $37K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 3The contract follows standard ERC-20 patterns with 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security being generally robust. 7.3 Access Control is absent as there are no privileged roles, which minimizes attack surface. 7.6 External integrations are standard, though 7.4 Economic logic is affected by the identified return value issue. 7.8 Operations are straightforward due to the lack of complex state-changing functions.
7.5 Governance is not applicable as the contract is immutable and lacks administrative functions. 7.4 Economic parameters are fixed at deployment. The token supply and transfer mechanics are transparent and predictable for all users.
7.7 Upgrades are not supported by the contract design. The contract is fully immutable, which eliminates risks associated with proxy patterns or logic updates. This provides high security for token holders regarding the persistence of contract rules.
The contract is safe for standard use, but the identified return value issue should be addressed to ensure compatibility with all ERC-20 compliant dApps.
Ensure that any future integrations account for the specific behavior of the transfer functions. No further administrative or upgradeability risks exist due to the immutable nature of the contract. Users should verify the contract address before interacting to ensure they are using the intended deployment.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Nov 3, 202640Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the MAMESUKE contract address?
The MAMESUKE contract on Ethereum is 0xa1ea9ff7e2ff11135bde1293b240033f6622cefc. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is MAMESUKE a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for MAMESUKE is 40/100 (Medium risk) as of Nov 3, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Mint: No mint; Liquidity lock: Locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Is MAMESUKE liquidity locked?
Liquidity lock: Locked (as of Nov 3, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $37.3K.
Who holds MAMESUKE?
As of Nov 3, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 27.0% of the supply across 237 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of MAMESUKE?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified