On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?
EthereumThe Mamesuke contract is an ERC-20 token with centralized administrative controls.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 2, 2026
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.
The 'stakeProcess' function uses 'blockhash' for randomness, which is predictable by miners and can be manipulated to influence the distribution amounts.
Use a verifiable source of randomness like Chainlink VRF instead of block-based data.
Unresolved
The 'stakeProcess' function allows the 'mamwallet' to move tokens out of the contract to arbitrary addresses, effectively allowing the controller to distribute tokens at will.
Remove the ability for the 'mamwallet' to arbitrarily move tokens or restrict it to a transparent, community-governed process.
Unresolved
The 'mamwallet' can toggle the 'clogsEnabled' switch and trigger swaps, which can halt or restrict user transfers at any time.
Implement a time-lock or multi-sig requirement for administrative actions that affect user transfers.
Unresolved
Liquidity $10K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $32K (DexScreener, all pools).
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Acknowledged
The 'stakeProcess' function performs division before multiplication, which can lead to precision loss in token distribution.
Perform all multiplications before divisions to maintain precision.
Unresolved
The 'mamwallet' can modify transaction and wallet limits, potentially creating unfair trading conditions.
Hardcode limits or use a decentralized governance vote to adjust them.
Unresolved
Functions like 'updatemamTaxRates' are restricted to the owner, but ownership has been renounced, rendering these functions permanently unusable.
Remove these functions during the next deployment to clean up the contract code.
Unresolved
The ten largest holders own 96.9% of supply. Of that, 70.2% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 13.8% in wallets, 12.8% in other contracts. 114 holders in total.
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Acknowledged
114 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Acknowledged
100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone.
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Acknowledged
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $10K of DEX liquidity across 2 pools. Launch: 210 days of market history.
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Acknowledged
The Mamesuke contract is an ERC-20 token with centralized administrative controls. While ownership has been renounced, the 'mamwallet' address retains significant power to manipulate token balances and transfer rules. The protocol exhibits high centralization risk due to these privileged functions.
The contract implements standard ERC-20 functionality with additional administrative hooks. 7.1 Architecture is straightforward, though 7.2 Code Security is impacted by reliance on block-based randomness. 7.3 Access Control is highly centralized, allowing the 'mamwallet' to override standard token behavior. 7.6 External interactions are limited to ETH transfers and token recovery.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance are heavily centralized under the 'mamwallet'. The ability to move user balances via 'stakeProcess' presents a significant risk to token holders. There are no decentralized governance mechanisms present.
7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy. 7.8 Operations are managed via static administrative functions. No upgrade path exists for the current implementation.
The protocol should transition to a decentralized model by removing the 'mamwallet' privileges.
The 'stakeProcess' function should be audited for potential abuse, as it allows arbitrary balance manipulation.
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified
