Is LOL Safe? Smart Contract Security Analysis

Security Findings

1 Info

Info

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

I-01This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

IssueThis token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

FixRead the risk score breakdown below as the substance of this audit. For a code-level review, the token would need an accompanying verified program.

StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium6/10

The LOL token is implemented using the spl-token-2022 program. Both the mint authority and freeze authority have been revoked, indicating that no new tokens can be minted and no existing accounts can be frozen. No Token-2022 extensions like a transfer hook or default account state frozen are active, nor are there any balance mutability or non-transferable features. The token has a supply of 989,420,346,292,857 with 6 decimals.

GovernanceHigh2/10

The token exhibits a healthy trading pattern with a 24-hour volume of $4,693 against a liquidity of $103,871, resulting in a normal Volume/Liquidity Ratio of 0.05. The DEX pair has been active for 114 days, providing a reasonable track record. Information regarding holder concentration was unavailable, preventing an assessment of potential whale influence.

UpgradesMedium5/10

The LOL token mint has a robust and immutable configuration, as both the mint and freeze authorities have been permanently revoked. This prevents any future changes to the token's supply or the ability to freeze holder accounts. Furthermore, the token's metadata is immutable, ensuring that its name, symbol, or image cannot be altered post-launch. No upgradable transfer fee or transfer hook features are present.

Security Checklist

1/4 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

No Mint Function?

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

Liquidity Depth

$114.4K across 7 pairs

PumpswapSOLanalysed$112.4K Meteora DLMMSOL$2.0K Meteora DYN2CSR$12 Meteora DYN2RNLD$7 Meteora DYN2SOL$2 Meteora DYN2PEPE$1

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

What Raised This Score

5 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 30% (34.2% total → 34.2% effective; 34.2% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — moderate)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Is LOL Safe?