Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is Launch a Scam?

LAUNCHBNB Chain
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 27, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 8h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The contract implements a standard ERC-20 token with custom fee exclusion logic.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • LP lock ends in 20d
  • Volume/Liquidity > 15×
  • Code: Unauthorized Token Withdrawal Risk
  • Code: Rounding Errors via Division Before Multiplication
  • Code: Trapped ETH in Contract
  • Code: Unchecked Token Transfer Results
Exact factors
  • LP lock ends in 20d (short-term protection)
  • Volume/Liquidity > 15× (23.5× — wash-trading signal)
  • Code: Unauthorized Token Withdrawal Risk (Critical, static analysis)
  • Code: Rounding Errors via Division Before Multiplication (Low, static analysis)
  • Code: Trapped ETH in Contract (Medium, static analysis)
  • Code: Unchecked Token Transfer Results (High, static analysis)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (8h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 276 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRenounced
MintNo mint
Liquidity lockLocked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax3.9% / 4%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 27, 202618,826 holders
75.0%Burned24.2%Everyone else
75.0%Burned24.2%Everyone else
ContractsBurnedDEX poolsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
75.8%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking0.3%
  • Burnedout of circulation75.0%
  • DEX poolsthe pools' own liquidity0.5%
  • Everyone else18,816 holders24.2%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads0.1%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 27, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 27$339.0K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensLocked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.

Analysed pool$339.0KShare of depth100.0%
LP Locked98.0% · Null Address, PinkLock02
Top-1 Unlocked Holder1.5%
Unlocked LP held by
0x0ed9…97060xbdf7…ce23

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

Security Findings

1 Critical1 High1 Medium1 Low6 Info
Critical

Unauthorized Token Withdrawal Risk

The _executeSwapAndLiquify function uses transferFrom in a way that could allow the contract to pull tokens from any user who has previously approved the contract, potentially draining user balances.CD-01

Issue

The _executeSwapAndLiquify function uses transferFrom in a way that could allow the contract to pull tokens from any user who has previously approved the contract, potentially draining user balances.

Fix

Restrict the scope of transferFrom calls to only interact with authorized liquidity pools or specific contract-owned addresses.

Status

Unresolved

High

Unchecked Token Transfer Results

The _executeSwapAndLiquify function ignores the boolean return value of ERC-20 transfer calls, which may lead to silent failures where tokens are not moved but the contract state updates as if they were.CD-04

Issue

The _executeSwapAndLiquify function ignores the boolean return value of ERC-20 transfer calls, which may lead to silent failures where tokens are not moved but the contract state updates as if they were.

Fix

Always check the return value of transfer and transferFrom calls or use OpenZeppelin's SafeERC20 library.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Trapped ETH in Contract

The contract includes a receive function that accepts ETH, but there is no logic implemented to withdraw or utilize these funds, causing them to be permanently locked.CD-03

Issue

The contract includes a receive function that accepts ETH, but there is no logic implemented to withdraw or utilize these funds, causing them to be permanently locked.

Fix

Implement a withdrawal function restricted to a multi-sig or DAO, or remove the receive function if ETH handling is not required.

Status

Unresolved

Low

Rounding Errors via Division Before Multiplication

In _executeSwapAndLiquify and _transfer, division is performed before multiplication, which leads to precision loss and potential inaccuracies in fee calculations.CD-02

Issue

In _executeSwapAndLiquify and _transfer, division is performed before multiplication, which leads to precision loss and potential inaccuracies in fee calculations.

Fix

Perform all multiplications before divisions to maintain precision.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 75.8% of supply. Of that, 75.0% burned, 0.5% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 0.0% in wallets, 0.3% in other contracts. 18,826 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 75.8% of supply. Of that, 75.0% burned, 0.5% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 0.0% in wallets, 0.3% in other contracts. 18,826 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

18,826 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

18,826 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Liquidity time-locked

98.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 98.0% is locked in PinkLock02 until 17 Nov 2026 (20 days). Until then nobody — the project included — can withdraw it unless the locker contract itself is flawed; after that date the lock's owner can. That date is close: treat it as short-term protection. 2.0% is held, unlocked, by 2 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

98.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 98.0% is locked in PinkLock02 until 17 Nov 2026 (20 days). Until then nobody — the project included — can withdraw it unless the locker contract itself is flawed; after that date the lock's owner can. That date is close: treat it as short-term protection. 2.0% is held, unlocked, by 2 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $339K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $8.0M (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $339K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $8.0M (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 3.9% on buy, 4% on sell. Market: $339K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 3.9% on buy, 4% on sell. Market: $339K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 27
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The contract implements a standard ERC-20 token with custom fee exclusion logic. Ownership has been renounced, meaning privileged functions are now permanently disabled. However, critical logic flaws in the internal swap mechanism and handling of ETH pose significant risks to users and contract integrity.

Technical6/10Medium risk

The contract architecture follows standard ERC-20 patterns with added fee exclusion capabilities. 7.1 Architecture is standard, 7.2 Code Security is compromised by unchecked return values, and 7.3 Access Control is currently locked due to renounced ownership. 7.6 External interactions are flawed as the contract lacks mechanisms to recover trapped ETH or validate token transfers.

Governance6/10Medium risk

7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance are effectively static as ownership is renounced. No further changes to fee exclusions or ownership can be made by the deployer. The economic model relies on the internal swap mechanism, which is currently non-functional for ETH extraction.

Upgrades6/10Medium risk

7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy. 7.8 Operations are limited to standard ERC-20 transfers. The contract is immutable by design due to the renounced ownership.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The contract should be considered high-risk due to the inability to recover trapped ETH and the presence of critical flaws in the internal swap logic.

Users should exercise extreme caution as the contract cannot be patched or updated to fix these issues.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkBNB Chain
Token age8h
Contract0x08ba…215f
Deployer0x634a…c304
Badge for your website
Launch security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 27, 202683High

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Launch?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified