The OptimismMintableERC20 contract functions as an ERC-20 token with a specific minting mechanism. The primary finding identifies that a designated 'bridge' address has the authority to mint new tokens, which could impact token supply and value. This design is inherent to Optimism's bridge architecture.
On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?
Is Impossible Cloud Network Token Safe?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The OptimismMintableERC20 contract functions as an ERC-20 token with a specific minting mechanism.
Read the full analysis- Owner can change any holder's balance
- Hidden owner — control survives an apparent renounce; held by bridge: Other-Contract
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by bridge: Other-Contract
- Ownership status UNKNOWN
- Liquidity not locked
Exact factors
- Owner can change any holder's balance (seize or credit tokens); held by bridge: Other-Contract
- Hidden owner — control survives an apparent renounce; held by bridge: Other-Contract
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by bridge: Other-Contract
- Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool; this pool is 55% of DEX liquidity) — who holds it cannot be verified
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 19Holders
as of audit · Oct 19, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking48.3%
- Everyone else76,540 holders51.7%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 19, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 19- Uniswap v3USDCAnalysed$80.9K55.4%
- PancakeswapUSDC$63.2K43.3%
- Uniswap v4USDC$9500.7%
- Uniswap v4cbBTC$4870.3%
- AerodromeUSDC$3210.2%
- AerodromeUSDC$590.0%
Show 3 more pairs
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0x3885…edcdSecurity Findings
MediumBridge can mint new tokens
The OptimismMintableERC20 token contract includes a function called mint(address,uint256) that allows a specific address, designated as the 'bridge', to create new tokens. When the 'bridge' calls this function, it increases the total supply of the token and assigns the newly minted tokens to a specified recipient. This means the 'bridge' has the power to increase the number of tokens in circulation at any time.CP-01
Issue
The OptimismMintableERC20 token contract includes a function called mint(address,uint256) that allows a specific address, designated as the 'bridge', to create new tokens. When the 'bridge' calls this function, it increases the total supply of the token and assigns the newly minted tokens to a specified recipient. This means the 'bridge' has the power to increase the number of tokens in circulation at any time.
Fix
Token holders should be aware that the 'bridge' address has the authority to mint new tokens. It is important to understand the security measures and operational controls in place for the 'bridge' address, as its compromise could lead to an uncontrolled increase in token supply, potentially diluting the value of existing tokens. Users should verify that the 'bridge' is managed securely, ideally through a robust multi-signature wallet or a time-locked contract.
Status
Unresolved
MediumLiquidity not locked
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0x3885…edcd — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 55% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0x3885…edcd — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 55% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 48.3% of supply. What remains: 0.0% in wallets, 48.3% in other contracts. 76,550 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 48.3% of supply. What remains: 0.0% in wallets, 48.3% in other contracts. 76,550 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoIdentity verified by independent sources
Listed on CoinGecko as Impossible Cloud Network Token (ICNT), market cap $44M, rank #503. Traded on Coinbase. 76,550 holders. Verified by: CoinGecko, exchange listings.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
Listed on CoinGecko as Impossible Cloud Network Token (ICNT), market cap $44M, rank #503. Traded on Coinbase. 76,550 holders. Verified by: CoinGecko, exchange listings.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $146K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $29.4M (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $1.4M (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $146K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $29.4M (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $1.4M (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $146K of DEX liquidity across 10 pools. Launch: 473 days of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $146K of DEX liquidity across 10 pools. Launch: 473 days of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 19The contract implements the standard ERC-20 token interface, providing essential functionalities like transfer, balanceOf, and approve. The architecture (7.1) is straightforward for an ERC-20 token. Code security (7.2) appears robust for standard operations. However, the mint(address,uint256) function, restricted by access control (7.3) to a 'bridge' address, allows for new token creation. This design choice is inherent to Optimism's bridge architecture but introduces a centralized point for supply expansion.
The economic model (7.4) of this token includes a minting capability, which is controlled by a 'bridge' address. This means the total supply of the token can be increased by the entity controlling the bridge, potentially diluting existing token holders. While this is a standard design for Optimism bridge tokens, it represents a significant economic control point. There is no explicit governance (7.5) mechanism within this contract itself, relying on the external governance of the bridge or the Optimism ecosystem.
The contract is not designed as an upgradeable proxy (7.7), meaning its logic cannot be changed post-deployment. This eliminates risks associated with upgrade mechanisms, such as proxy implementation mismatches or insecure upgrade paths. Any changes to the token's core logic would require a new deployment and migration. This design choice simplifies operational risks (7.8) related to upgrades.
It is crucial for token holders to understand that the 'bridge' address has the power to mint new tokens, which can increase the total supply.
Users should be aware of the security and operational procedures governing this 'bridge' address, as its compromise could lead to unauthorized token minting. Ensure the 'bridge' address is secured with robust multi-signature or time-locked controls.
Contract & Record
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Impossible Cloud Network Token?
Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page