The provided contract address is not verified on the Arbitrum block explorer. No source code was available for analysis, rendering the protocol's security posture impossible to verify. Immediate verification and a comprehensive audit are required before any capital deployment.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is Immix a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The provided contract address is not verified on the Arbitrum block explorer.
Read the full analysis- Mint capability UNKNOWN
- Ownership status UNKNOWN
- Liquidity not locked
- Top-10 concentration > 70%
- Contract source not verified — its logic cannot be read
Exact factors
- Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
- Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
- Top-10 concentration > 70% (93.3% total → 91.9% effective; 90.9% in EOAs, 2.4% in contracts)
- Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 20Holders
as of audit · Oct 20, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking2.4%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell90.9%
- Everyone else407 holders6.7%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 20, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 20The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0xbde4…0c9d0x1d2a…158cNo privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.
Security Findings
CriticalUnverified Contract Source
The contract at the provided address is not verified on the blockchain explorer, preventing any security analysis or logic verification.C-01
Issue
The contract at the provided address is not verified on the blockchain explorer, preventing any security analysis or logic verification.
Fix
Verify the contract source code on the Arbitrum block explorer immediately.
Status
Unresolved
MediumLiquidity not locked
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 2 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0xbde4…0c9d — holds 99.8% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 2 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0xbde4…0c9d — holds 99.8% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 93.3% of supply. What remains: 90.9% in wallets, 2.4% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 2.4%. 417 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 93.3% of supply. What remains: 90.9% in wallets, 2.4% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 2.4%. 417 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
417 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
417 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $83K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $129K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $83K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $129K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $83K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $83K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 207.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security cannot be assessed without source code. 7.3 Access Control and 7.6 External dependencies are currently opaque. The lack of transparency prevents any validation of logic or safety mechanisms.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance models are unknown. Without documentation or code, the risk of rug-pulls or malicious governance parameters remains at maximum. No economic safety guarantees exist.
7.7 Upgrades and 7.8 Operations are unverified. It is unknown if the contract utilizes proxy patterns or immutable logic. The potential for hidden backdoors or unauthorized upgrades is high.
Do not interact with this contract address. Verify the source code on the block explorer and perform a professional security audit before considering any integration or fund deposit.
Contract & Record
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Immix?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page