The contract is a standard ERC-20 token implemented as an EIP-1167 minimal clone. Ownership has been renounced on-chain, effectively locking the administrative functions and ensuring the current transfer logic remains immutable. The codebase is well-structured, though minor mathematical rounding issues and state shadowing were identified.

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is Hack Inu a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The contract is a standard ERC-20 token implemented as an EIP-1167 minimal clone.
Read the full analysis- Liquidity not locked
- Liquidity < $50k
- Volume/Liquidity > 15×
- Top-10 concentration > 20%
- Code: Rounding Loss in Normalization
- Code: State Variable Shadowing
Exact factors
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
- Liquidity < $50k ($10,649 across 2 pairs — thin market)
- Volume/Liquidity > 15× (134.7× — wash-trading signal)
- Top-10 concentration > 20% (54.5% total → 27.0% effective; 8.6% in EOAs, 45.8% in contracts)
- Code: Rounding Loss in Normalization (Low, static analysis)
- Code: State Variable Shadowing (High, static analysis)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 31Holders
as of audit · Oct 31, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking45.8%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell8.6%
- Everyone else851 holders45.5%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 31, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 31The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0xb6b0…a5810xf94d…0d350x1024…fffb0xc577…aa0cNo privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.
Security Findings
HighState Variable Shadowing
The contract contains instances where local variables shadow state variables, which can lead to unintended logic errors during state updates.CD-02
Issue
The contract contains instances where local variables shadow state variables, which can lead to unintended logic errors during state updates.
Fix
Rename local variables to ensure they do not conflict with existing state variable names.
Status
Unresolved
MediumLiquidity not locked
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 4 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0xb6b0…a581 — holds 64.4% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 4 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0xb6b0…a581 — holds 64.4% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
LowRounding Loss in Normalization
The 'normalizeAmount' function performs division before multiplication, which can lead to precision loss during token calculations.CD-01
Issue
The 'normalizeAmount' function performs division before multiplication, which can lead to precision loss during token calculations.
Fix
Refactor the calculation to perform multiplication before division to maintain higher precision.
Status
Unresolved
InfoDormant Administrative Transfer Controls
The contract contains a 'setMode' function that allows an owner to toggle transfer rules. Because ownership has been renounced, this function is now permanently inaccessible, rendering the transfer logic immutable.CP-05
Issue
The contract contains a 'setMode' function that allows an owner to toggle transfer rules. Because ownership has been renounced, this function is now permanently inaccessible, rendering the transfer logic immutable.
Fix
No action required as the renounced ownership provides a security guarantee against future changes.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 54.5% of supply. What remains: 8.6% in wallets, 45.8% in other contracts. 861 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 54.5% of supply. What remains: 8.6% in wallets, 45.8% in other contracts. 861 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
861 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
861 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $11K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.4M (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $11K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.4M (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Meme token
A community token whose value comes from attention rather than a product. Being a meme is not a risk in itself: it is scored on exactly the same contract and market facts as any other token. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: meme vocabulary in name/ticker (inu); launched on four.meme, a meme launchpad. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $11K of DEX liquidity across 2 pools. Launch: launched on four.meme, under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A community token whose value comes from attention rather than a product. Being a meme is not a risk in itself: it is scored on exactly the same contract and market facts as any other token. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: meme vocabulary in name/ticker (inu); launched on four.meme, a meme launchpad. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $11K of DEX liquidity across 2 pools. Launch: launched on four.meme, under a day of market history.
Fix
Expect attention-driven volatility; the facts in this report say whether the contract itself can be used against holders.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 31The contract follows standard ERC-20 patterns with clean implementation logic. 7.1 Architecture: Uses EIP-1167 for gas-efficient deployment. 7.2 Code Security: Logic is generally sound, though precision loss in division exists. 7.3 Access Control: Privileged functions are properly restricted, and ownership is renounced, preventing unauthorized state changes.
7.4 Economic: The token functions as a standard asset without complex inflationary or deflationary mechanisms. 7.5 Governance: Ownership is renounced, meaning no central authority can influence token economics. 7.6 External: Interactions with external pools are restricted to pre-defined addresses, minimizing external dependency risks.
7.7 Upgrades: The contract is an EIP-1167 minimal clone, which is inherently immutable. 7.8 Operations: No upgrade paths exist, ensuring long-term consistency of the token logic. The implementation address is fixed at deployment.
Given that ownership is renounced, the contract is effectively immutable.
Users should be aware that the current transfer logic is permanent and cannot be altered by any party. For future deployments, ensure that all mathematical operations follow the 'multiply before divide' rule to maintain precision. Additionally, perform thorough static analysis to identify and resolve variable shadowing before finalizing production code.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 31, 202650Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the HI contract address?
The Hack Inu (HI) contract on BNB Chain is 0x1a700335ece5c42834d6dd1f74204eec8e194444. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is Hack Inu a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for Hack Inu is 50/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 31, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Renounced; Mint: No mint; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Is HI liquidity locked?
Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 31, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $10.6K.
Who holds HI?
As of Oct 31, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 54.5% of the supply across 861 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Hack Inu?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified