On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?
The protocol implements a standard ERC-20 token with centralized minting capabilities.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 31, 2026
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0x15c7…e2ae0xcc2b…49070xb303…f7e40x4b1b…954a0x83c2…d2f60x3502…5cefNo privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.
The 'mint' function allows the designated issuer address to create new tokens at will. This increases the total supply and dilutes the value of existing holdings, posing a risk if the issuer's private key is compromised.
Restrict the minting capability to a multi-signature wallet or implement a hard-coded supply cap with a timelock delay for any minting events.
Unresolved
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 5 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 49% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Acknowledged
The ten largest holders own 57.2% of supply. What remains: 45.8% in wallets, 11.4% in other contracts. 1,667 holders in total.
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Acknowledged
Listed on CoinGecko as GULD (GULD). 1,667 holders.
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Acknowledged
Liquidity $3.0M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $11K (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $175K (DexScreener, all pools).
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Acknowledged
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $3.0M of DEX liquidity across 4 pools. Launch: 140 days of market history.
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Acknowledged
The protocol implements a standard ERC-20 token with centralized minting capabilities. The architecture is straightforward and follows standard patterns for ownership and supply management. While the code is secure and well-structured, the centralized control over token issuance represents a significant economic risk to token holders.
The contract utilizes standard OpenZeppelin-like patterns for ERC-20 compliance and ownership management. 7.1 Architecture is clean, and 7.2 Code Security is robust, utilizing Solidity 0.8.x to prevent overflows. 7.3 Access Control is correctly implemented using modifiers for privileged functions. 7.6 External dependencies are minimal, reducing the attack surface.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance risks are centered on the centralized issuer role. The owner has the authority to mint new tokens, which directly impacts the total supply and token value. While this is a common design for centralized tokens, it lacks transparency or time-locks for minting actions.
7.7 Upgrades are not applicable as the contract is not a proxy. The logic is immutable, ensuring that the current rules cannot be altered post-deployment. 7.8 Operations are limited to standard administrative functions like ownership transfer.
The protocol should consider implementing a multi-signature wallet for the owner and issuer roles to mitigate the risk of a single compromised key.
Additionally, introducing a timelock for minting operations would provide transparency and protection for token holders against sudden supply inflation.
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified
