Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is GTA6DOG a Scam?

RICOEthereum
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Nov 3, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 13h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The RICO token is a standard ERC-20 implementation. The audit identified a critical logic flaw in the transfer mechanism where internal state checks for wallet limits are disconnected from the actual execution flow, potentially leading to inconsistent token behavior.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Liquidity < $50k
  • Code: Inconsistent Transfer Validation Logic
Exact factors
  • Liquidity < $50k ($43,868 across 1 pairs — thin market)
  • Code: Inconsistent Transfer Validation Logic (High, static analysis)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (13h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Nov 36 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipUnknown
MintNo mint
Liquidity lockLocked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Nov 3, 2026356 holders
11.7%Contracts5.5%81.9%Everyone else
11.7%5.5%81.9%Everyone else
ContractsWalletsBurnedEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
18.1%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking11.7%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell5.5%
  • Burnedout of circulation0.9%
  • Everyone else346 holders81.9%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads10.2%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 3, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Nov 3$43.9K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensLocked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.

Analysed pool$43.9KShare of depth100.0%
LP Burned100.0% · ≈ permanent lock
LP Locked100.0% · Dead Address

Security Findings

1 High6 Info
High

Inconsistent Transfer Validation Logic

The functions _transfer, maxWalletLimits, transfer, and transferFrom contain a logic flaw where wallet limit checks are not properly integrated into the execution flow. This allows transfers to proceed even when they should be restricted by the defined wallet limits, leading to potential bypasses of intended token distribution constraints.CD-01

Issue

The functions _transfer, maxWalletLimits, transfer, and transferFrom contain a logic flaw where wallet limit checks are not properly integrated into the execution flow. This allows transfers to proceed even when they should be restricted by the defined wallet limits, leading to potential bypasses of intended token distribution constraints.

Fix

Refactor the _transfer function to include a mandatory call to the wallet limit validation logic before updating balances. Ensure that if the limit is exceeded, the transaction reverts with a descriptive error message.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 18.1% of supply. Of that, 0.9% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 5.5% in wallets, 11.7% in other contracts. 356 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 18.1% of supply. Of that, 0.9% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 5.5% in wallets, 11.7% in other contracts. 356 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

356 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

356 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Liquidity burned — cannot be withdrawn

100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $44K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $431K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $44K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $431K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $44K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $44K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 3
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The RICO token is a standard ERC-20 implementation. The audit identified a critical logic flaw in the transfer mechanism where internal state checks for wallet limits are disconnected from the actual execution flow, potentially leading to inconsistent token behavior. The contract lacks administrative controls, which provides immutability but prevents emergency intervention.

Technical8/10Low risk

The architecture follows standard ERC-20 patterns with 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security being generally compliant. 7.3 Access Control is absent, meaning no privileged roles exist. 7.6 External dependencies are minimal, relying on OpenZeppelin standards. However, the logic error in transfer validation poses a significant risk to integration compatibility.

Governance8/10Low risk

7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance factors are neutral as the contract is immutable and lacks complex DeFi primitives. There are no inflationary mechanisms or governance voting systems present. The token relies entirely on market forces for valuation.

Upgrades8/10Low risk

7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy. 7.8 Operations are straightforward due to the lack of administrative functions. The code is permanently deployed as-is.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The development team should immediately refactor the transfer logic to ensure that internal wallet limit checks are strictly enforced before state updates occur.

Ensure that all return values in the transfer path correctly reflect the success or failure of the underlying operations to maintain compatibility with external DeFi protocols.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkEthereum
Token age13h
Contract0x0cf2…e35e
Deployer0xdce8…5997
Badge for your website
GTA6DOG security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Nov 3, 202640Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of GTA6DOG?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified