Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is Groklet a Scam?

GROKLETEthereum
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 29, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 5h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The GROKLET contract is a standard ERC-20 token implementation.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Liquidity < $50k
  • Code: Incorrect Return Value Handling in Transfer Functions
Exact factors
  • Liquidity < $50k ($39,913 across 1 pairs — thin market)
  • Code: Incorrect Return Value Handling in Transfer Functions (High, static analysis)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (5h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 296 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipUnknown
MintNo mint
Liquidity lockLocked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 29, 2026349 holders
12.5%Contracts8.7%78.9%Everyone else
12.5%Contracts8.7%78.9%Everyone else
ContractsWalletsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
21.1%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking12.5%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell8.7%
  • Everyone else339 holders78.9%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads13.6%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 29, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 29$39.9K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensLocked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.

Analysed pool$39.9KShare of depth100.0%
LP Burned100.0% · ≈ permanent lock
LP Locked100.0% · Dead Address

Security Findings

1 High6 Info
High

Incorrect Return Value Handling in Transfer Functions

The functions _transfer, transfer, and transferFrom do not correctly handle or return the expected boolean values required by the ERC-20 standard. This can lead to integration failures where external contracts expect a return value to confirm the success of a token transfer.CD-01

Issue

The functions _transfer, transfer, and transferFrom do not correctly handle or return the expected boolean values required by the ERC-20 standard. This can lead to integration failures where external contracts expect a return value to confirm the success of a token transfer.

Fix

Update the _transfer logic to explicitly return a boolean value and ensure that the public transfer and transferFrom functions correctly propagate this result to the caller.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 21.1% of supply. What remains: 8.7% in wallets, 12.5% in other contracts. 349 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 21.1% of supply. What remains: 8.7% in wallets, 12.5% in other contracts. 349 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

349 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

349 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Liquidity burned — cannot be withdrawn

100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $40K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $181K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $40K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $181K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $40K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $40K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 29
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The GROKLET contract is a standard ERC-20 token implementation. The audit identified a critical logic flaw in the transfer mechanism where the return values of internal transfer functions are not correctly handled or verified, potentially causing integration issues with external protocols. 7.1 Architecture: Standard ERC-20. 7.2 Code Security: High risk due to return value handling. 7.3 Access Control: None. 7.4 Economic: Standard. 7.5 Governance: None. 7.6 External: High risk for integrations. 7.7 Upgrades: N/A. 7.8 Operations: Standard.

Technical8/10Low risk

The contract utilizes standard OpenZeppelin-like ERC-20 logic. It correctly implements core functions like balanceOf and allowance. However, the internal transfer logic fails to properly propagate return values, which is a significant deviation from the ERC-20 standard. This could cause automated systems or smart contracts interacting with this token to fail or misinterpret transaction outcomes.

Governance8/10Low risk

The contract lacks any governance or economic parameters. There are no minting, burning, or fee mechanisms present. The token supply is fixed at deployment. No economic risks are identified.

Upgrades8/10Low risk

The contract is not upgradeable. It does not utilize any proxy patterns. The logic is immutable once deployed.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The primary recommendation is to refactor the _transfer function to ensure it adheres strictly to the ERC-20 specification regarding return values.

Ensure that all transfer-related functions return a boolean indicating success or failure to maintain compatibility with DeFi protocols. Additionally, perform a comprehensive integration test with common DEX routers to ensure that the current implementation does not cause transaction reverts or unexpected state changes in liquidity pools.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkEthereum
Token age5h
Contract0x4332…8fb1
Deployer0x155e…0303
Badge for your website
Groklet security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 29, 202640Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Groklet?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified