The groklet token is an ERC-20 compliant contract with renounced ownership, enhancing decentralization by making owner-restricted functions dormant. While core ERC-20 functions are standard, a specific 'ownerOrAuthorized' address retains the ability to modify transaction and wallet size limits, which is identified as a low-severity concern. The contract is not upgradeable, eliminating upgrade-related risks.

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is GROKLET a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The groklet token is an ERC-20 compliant contract with renounced ownership, enhancing decentralization by making owner-restricted functions dormant.
Read the full analysis- A privileged address can change transfer or wallet limits; held by authorized: EOA
- Top-10 concentration > 20%
Exact factors
- A privileged address can change transfer or wallet limits; held by authorized: EOA
- Top-10 concentration > 20% (72.9% total → 29.9% effective; 5.7% in EOAs, 60.6% in contracts; 6.6% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 18Holders
as of audit · Oct 18, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking60.6%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell5.7%
- DEX poolsthe pools' own liquidity6.6%
- Everyone else401 holders27.1%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 18, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 18The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.
Security Findings
LowA privileged address can change transfer or wallet limits
Numeric limits checked in the transfer path (maximum transaction or wallet size, thresholds) can be changed by a privileged function. Functions: removeLimit. Restricted to: authorized, ownerorauthorized.CP-08
Issue
Numeric limits checked in the transfer path (maximum transaction or wallet size, thresholds) can be changed by a privileged function. Functions: removeLimit. Restricted to: authorized, ownerorauthorized.
Fix
Check who holds these functions and whether a timelock or multisig stands between them and holders.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 72.9% of supply. Of that, 6.6% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 5.7% in wallets, 60.6% in other contracts. 411 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 72.9% of supply. Of that, 6.6% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 5.7% in wallets, 60.6% in other contracts. 411 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
411 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
411 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoLiquidity burned — cannot be withdrawn
100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $59K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $444K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $59K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $444K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $59K of DEX liquidity across 2 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $59K of DEX liquidity across 2 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — 1 day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 18The groklet contract implements standard ERC-20 functionality (7.1 Architecture), with transfer and transferFrom correctly overriding the base _transfer logic. The contract includes mechanisms to enforce maximum transaction (_maxTxAmount) and wallet size (_maxWalletSize) limits, which are checked during token transfers (7.2 Code Security). However, the removeLimit function allows an ownerOrAuthorized address to disable these limits by setting them to the total supply, which could alter expected transfer behavior.
Ownership of the contract has been renounced (7.3 Access Control), meaning the original owner can no longer call onlyOwner functions like manualTokenSend or manualETHSend, rendering them dormant. This enhances decentralization. However, the removeLimit function, which controls critical transfer parameters (_maxTxAmount, _maxWalletSize), is restricted to an ownerOrAuthorized address (7.5 Governance). This means a specific non-owner address retains significant control over token transfer mechanics, posing a low economic risk (7.4 Economic) if misused.
The groklet contract is not implemented as an upgradeable proxy (7.7 Upgrades). Therefore, its logic cannot be changed after deployment, eliminating upgrade-related risks. Any future modifications to the contract's functionality would require a new contract deployment and a migration process for token holders.
Token holders should be aware that while contract ownership is renounced, a specific 'ownerOrAuthorized' address retains the ability to modify or remove transaction and wallet size limits via the removeLimit function.
It is recommended to understand who controls this 'ownerOrAuthorized' address and its operational policies. For enhanced security and decentralization, consider implementing a multi-signature wallet for such critical administrative roles or removing the ability to change these limits entirely if they are intended to be immutable.
Contract & Record
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of GROKLET?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page