The GROKLET token is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional transfer limits. Ownership has been renounced, effectively locking the administrative functions. The audit identified a high-severity issue regarding return values in transfer functions, though the contract logic remains functional for standard token operations.

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is Groklet a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The GROKLET token is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional transfer limits.
Read the full analysis- Liquidity < $50k
- Top-10 concentration > 20%
- Code: Non-Compliant Return Values in Transfer Functions
Exact factors
- Liquidity < $50k ($34,568 across 1 pairs — thin market)
- Top-10 concentration > 20% (29.1% total → 20.7% effective; 20.7% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts; 8.4% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
- Code: Non-Compliant Return Values in Transfer Functions (High, static analysis)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 27Holders
as of audit · Oct 27, 2026- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell20.7%
- DEX poolsthe pools' own liquidity8.4%
- Everyone else287 holders70.9%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 27, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 27The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.
Security Findings
HighNon-Compliant Return Values in Transfer Functions
The transfer and transferFrom functions do not consistently return a boolean value as required by the ERC-20 standard. This can cause integration failures with external protocols or smart contracts that expect a boolean return to confirm transaction success.CD-01
Issue
The transfer and transferFrom functions do not consistently return a boolean value as required by the ERC-20 standard. This can cause integration failures with external protocols or smart contracts that expect a boolean return to confirm transaction success.
Fix
Ensure that all transfer functions explicitly return 'true' upon successful execution, or use a library like OpenZeppelin's SafeERC20 to handle non-compliant tokens.
Status
Unresolved
InfoDormant Administrative Control over Transfer Limits
The removeLimits function allows an owner to modify transaction and wallet size constraints. Because ownership has been renounced, these functions are now unreachable and pose no active risk.CP-08
Issue
The removeLimits function allows an owner to modify transaction and wallet size constraints. Because ownership has been renounced, these functions are now unreachable and pose no active risk.
Fix
No action required as ownership is already renounced, effectively disabling these administrative capabilities.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 29.1% of supply. Of that, 8.4% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 20.7% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. 297 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 29.1% of supply. Of that, 8.4% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 20.7% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. 297 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
297 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
297 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoLiquidity burned — cannot be withdrawn
100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $35K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $78K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $35K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $78K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $35K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $35K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 27The architecture follows a standard ERC-20 pattern with added transaction and wallet limits. 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security are generally sound, though 7.3 Access Control is now effectively immutable due to ownership renouncement. 7.6 External interactions are minimal, reducing the attack surface for external exploits.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance factors are neutralized by the renouncement of ownership. The protocol does not utilize complex staking or lending mechanisms. 7.8 Operations are limited to standard token transfers.
7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy. The logic is fixed and immutable, providing high certainty regarding the contract's future behavior.
While the contract is immutable, the return value issue in transfer functions may cause integration failures with certain dApps or automated wallets that strictly enforce ERC-20 compliance.
Users should verify compatibility with their specific wallet or exchange interfaces before interacting with the token. Since ownership is renounced, no further administrative actions can be taken to mitigate the identified issues. Future deployments should ensure strict adherence to the ERC-20 return value standard to maintain interoperability.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 27, 202645Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the GROKLET contract address?
The Groklet contract on Ethereum is 0xa8e21314847f3457893a8fe0d37916f5a7925955. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is Groklet a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for Groklet is 45/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 27, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Renounced; Mint: No mint; Liquidity lock: Locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Is GROKLET liquidity locked?
Liquidity lock: Locked (as of Oct 27, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $34.6K.
Who holds GROKLET?
As of Oct 27, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 29.1% of the supply across 297 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Groklet?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified