The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer. Consequently, the source code is inaccessible, and no technical audit of the logic, security, or functionality can be performed. Investors should exercise extreme caution as the lack of transparency prevents verification of ownership, tax mechanisms, or liquidity safety.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is Grokbot The Trencher a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer.
Read the full analysis- Mint capability UNKNOWN
- Ownership status UNKNOWN
- Liquidity not locked
- Volume/Liquidity > 15×
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
- Contract source not verified — its logic cannot be read
Exact factors
- Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
- Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — withdrawable by the owner/deployer — rug-pull risk
- Volume/Liquidity > 15× (20.7× — wash-trading signal)
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (41.1% total → 35.4% effective; 31.6% in EOAs, 9.4% in contracts)
- Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 28Holders
as of audit · Oct 28, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking9.4%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell31.6%
- Everyone else851 holders58.9%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 28, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 28The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0x0951…7c25A privileged address — the deployer, the owner, or the token contract itself — is among these holders, so that party can withdraw liquidity.
Security Findings
CriticalUnverified Source Code
The contract source code is not verified on the block explorer, rendering the contract logic, security, and ownership structure completely opaque.C-01
Issue
The contract source code is not verified on the block explorer, rendering the contract logic, security, and ownership structure completely opaque.
Fix
Verify the contract source code on the block explorer to allow for public audit and transparency.
Status
Unresolved
HighLiquidity withdrawable by the owner/deployer
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by the token's owner/deployer (0x0951…7c25) — they can pull that liquidity at any moment. This is the rug-pull path. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by the token's owner/deployer (0x0951…7c25) — they can pull that liquidity at any moment. This is the rug-pull path. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 41.1% of supply. What remains: 31.6% in wallets, 9.4% in other contracts. 861 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 41.1% of supply. What remains: 31.6% in wallets, 9.4% in other contracts. 861 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
861 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
861 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $156K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $3.2M (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $156K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $3.2M (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $156K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $156K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 28The technical architecture cannot be assessed due to the absence of verified source code. 7.1 Architecture, 7.2 Code Security, and 7.3 Access Control are entirely opaque. Without bytecode analysis, it is impossible to determine if the contract contains backdoors, honeypot mechanisms, or standard ERC-20 compliance. Users must assume the highest level of technical risk.
Economic parameters such as 7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance are unverifiable. There is no way to confirm if the contract owner has the ability to pause trading, blacklist addresses, or modify tax rates. 7.6 External dependencies remain unknown, posing a significant risk of rug-pull or liquidity manipulation.
The contract's upgradeability status (7.7 Upgrades) cannot be confirmed. If the contract is a proxy, the implementation logic is hidden, allowing for potential silent updates to the contract behavior. 7.8 Operations are equally opaque, providing no assurance of secure management practices.
Do not interact with this contract. The lack of verified source code is a primary indicator of high-risk projects, as it prevents the community from auditing the contract for malicious functions or vulnerabilities.
If you are considering an investment, wait for the developer to verify the source code on the block explorer. Without transparency, there is no technical guarantee that your funds can be recovered or that the token can be sold.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 28, 202684High
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the GROKBOT contract address?
The Grokbot The Trencher (GROKBOT) contract on Base is 0x22330df5a10dac06f41f196c8a8f9a9d67dfdb24. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is Grokbot The Trencher a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for Grokbot The Trencher is 84/100 (High risk) as of Oct 28, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Not verified; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Is GROKBOT liquidity locked?
Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 28, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $155.9K.
Who holds GROKBOT?
As of Oct 28, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 41.1% of the supply across 861 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Grokbot The Trencher?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified