ScarabToken is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional administrative functions for minting and liquidity management. The contract utilizes OpenZeppelin standards for core logic, ensuring robust transfer mechanisms. The primary risk involves centralized control over supply and liquidity, which is typical for this token architecture.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is Grok Agent a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →ScarabToken is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional administrative functions for minting and liquidity management.
Read the full analysis- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by minter: EOA
- Ownership status UNKNOWN
- Liquidity < $50k
- Volume/Liquidity > 15×
Exact factors
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by minter: EOA
- Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
- Liquidity < $50k ($11,530 across 1 pairs — thin market)
- Volume/Liquidity > 15× (18.6× — wash-trading signal)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Nov 2Holders
as of audit · Nov 2, 2026- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell5.6%
- Burnedout of circulation15.1%
- DEX poolsthe pools' own liquidity63.7%
- Everyone else361 holders15.7%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 2, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Nov 2The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.
0x0ed9…9706No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.
Security Findings
MediumCentralized Control Over Token Supply
The minter role has the authority to call mint() and restoreFrom(), which can increase the total supply or move tokens from user balances. This allows the controller to dilute the value of existing holdings at their discretion.CP-01
Issue
The minter role has the authority to call mint() and restoreFrom(), which can increase the total supply or move tokens from user balances. This allows the controller to dilute the value of existing holdings at their discretion.
Fix
Restrict the minter role to a multi-signature wallet or a timelocked governance contract to prevent unilateral actions that could negatively impact token holders.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 84.3% of supply. Of that, 15.1% burned, 63.7% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 5.6% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. 371 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 84.3% of supply. Of that, 15.1% burned, 63.7% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 5.6% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. 371 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
371 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
371 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoLiquidity burned — cannot be withdrawn
99.6% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 99.6% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. 0.4% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
99.6% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 99.6% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. 0.4% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $12K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $214K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $12K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $214K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 2% on buy, 2% on sell. Market: $12K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 2% on buy, 2% on sell. Market: $12K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 2The architecture follows standard ERC-20 patterns with 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security adhering to best practices. 7.3 Access Control is implemented via a minter role, ensuring only authorized addresses can invoke sensitive functions. 7.6 External interactions are limited to standard token transfers, minimizing attack surfaces.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are centralized under the minter role. The ability to mint tokens and manipulate liquidity balances creates a trust-based model for token holders. While functional, this centralization allows for significant supply changes without community oversight.
The contract is not upgradeable, which eliminates 7.7 Upgrades risk. 7.8 Operations are straightforward and rely on the immutability of the deployed bytecode. No proxy patterns are utilized.
The protocol should consider transitioning the minter role to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to mitigate the risks associated with centralized control.
Additionally, implementing a timelock on sensitive functions like minting would provide transparency and protection for token holders against sudden supply changes.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Nov 2, 202670High
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Grok Agent?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified