Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is Niannian_GiggleAcademy a Scam?

年年

BNB Chain

Not verified

This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →

Last checked Oct 23, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 11h old

Chart

70/ 100

High RiskHow is this score calculated?

How the score breaks downratings: 10 is safest

Technical6/10 Governance2/10 Upgrades6/10 Checks passed4 of 7 Findings1 Critical · 1 High · 1 Medium · 6 Info9

SummaryAI Copilot

The contract at the provided address is not verified on the block explorer, preventing any static or dynamic analysis of the source code.

Read the full analysis

What raised the score

Mint capability UNKNOWN
Volume/Liquidity > 15×
Top-10 concentration > 50%
Contract source not verified — its logic cannot be read

Exact factors

Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Volume/Liquidity > 15× (192.2× — wash-trading signal)
Top-10 concentration > 50% (80.4% total → 69.5% effective; 69.5% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts; 10.9% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (11h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 234 of 7 checks passed

Contract verifiedNot verified

OwnershipRetained

MintUnknown

Liquidity lockLocked

UpgradeabilityFixed code

HoneypotNone found

Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 23, 20261,387 holders

WalletsDEX poolsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply

80.4%of supply sits with the top 10 holders

Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell69.5%
DEX poolsthe pools' own liquidity10.9%
Everyone else1,377 holders19.6%

Effective concentrationwhat the score reads69.5%

How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 23, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 23$1.48M

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensLocked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.

Analysed pool$1.48MShare of depth100.0%

LP Locked100.0% · Null Address, PinkLock02

Security Findings

1 Critical1 High1 Medium6 Info

Critical

Unverified Source Code

The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, making it impossible to audit for backdoors, honeypot mechanisms, or logic errors.C-01

Issue

The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, making it impossible to audit for backdoors, honeypot mechanisms, or logic errors.

Fix

Publish and verify the source code on the block explorer to allow for community and security review.

Status

Unresolved

High

Centralized Ownership

The contract is controlled by an EOA, and ownership has not been renounced, allowing the owner to potentially modify critical parameters or drain liquidity.H-01

Issue

The contract is controlled by an EOA, and ownership has not been renounced, allowing the owner to potentially modify critical parameters or drain liquidity.

Fix

Renounce ownership or transfer control to a multi-signature wallet or a time-locked governance contract.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Lack of Transparency

The absence of verified code prevents users from understanding the tokenomics, including potential transaction taxes or transfer restrictions.M-01

Issue

The absence of verified code prevents users from understanding the tokenomics, including potential transaction taxes or transfer restrictions.

Fix

Provide a clear, documented whitepaper and verified code to establish trust with the community.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 80.4% of supply. Of that, 10.9% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 69.5% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. 1,387 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

1,387 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

1,387 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Liquidity time-locked

100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is locked in PinkLock02 until 31 Oct 2027 (372 days). Until then nobody — the project included — can withdraw it unless the locker contract itself is flawed; after that date the lock's owner can.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $1.5M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $285.0M (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $1.5M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $285.0M (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: a single wallet (EOA). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $1.5M of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 23

Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The contract at the provided address is not verified on the block explorer, preventing any static or dynamic analysis of the source code. The contract is controlled by an EOA (Externally Owned Account), and ownership has not been renounced, posing a significant centralization risk. Investors should exercise extreme caution as the lack of transparency precludes verification of tax mechanisms, minting capabilities, or liquidity lock status.

Technical6/10Medium risk

7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security cannot be assessed due to the lack of verified source code. 7.3 Access Control is likely centralized under an EOA, which is a common vector for rug-pulls. 7.6 External dependencies and 7.8 Operations remain opaque and unverifiable.

Governance2/10High risk

7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance parameters are hidden from public view. The EOA owner has full control over potential minting or tax functions. There is no evidence of a DAO or decentralized governance structure.

Upgrades6/10Medium risk

7.7 Upgrades cannot be verified. If the contract is a proxy, the implementation logic is obscured. Without source verification, the ability to modify contract behavior post-deployment remains a critical risk.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

Do not interact with this contract until the source code is verified on the block explorer.

Verify the contract logic for hidden minting functions, ownership transfer mechanisms, and tax logic before considering any financial exposure.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record

Type-

NetworkBNB Chain

Token age11h

Contract0x790d…7777

Deployer0xf727…dee4

Badge for your website

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History

Oct 23, 202670High

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the 年年 contract address?

The Niannian_GiggleAcademy (年年) contract on BNB Chain is 0x790d54a05292bbb2516ce96223127afacc827777. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.