Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Is GriffinAI Safe?

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page →

GriffinAI GAIN
0xa890…a96f
BNB Chain
Not verifiedThis record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked today 1 audit on record
DexScreener ↗
How is this score calculated? → Medium Risk
Executive SummaryAI Copilot

The GainOFT contract is an ERC-20 token with Omnichain Fungible Token (OFT) capabilities, enabling cross-chain transfers via LayerZero. While it implements standard token functionality and robust ownership management, a key finding identifies that specific functions allow for the minting of new tokens by a privileged 'endpoint' address, which could dilute existing token holders.

2 Medium4 Informational
Volume 24h
$346.6K
Liquidity
$79.8K
Price
$0.002427
Token Age
1y
Top 10 Holders
91.9%

Security Findings

2 Med4 Info
Medium

Privileged Address Can Mint New Tokens

CP-01The `send`, `lzReceiveSimulate`, and `lzReceive` functions allow a specific address, referred to as the `endpoint`, to create new tokens. This means that the total supply of GainOFT tokens can be increased by the `endpoint` without explicit approval from token holders. If this `endpoint` is compromised or misused, it could lead to an uncontrolled increase in token supply, diluting the value of existing tokens held by users.
IssueThe `send`, `lzReceiveSimulate`, and `lzReceive` functions allow a specific address, referred to as the `endpoint`, to create new tokens. This means that the total supply of GainOFT tokens can be increased by the `endpoint` without explicit approval from token holders. If this `endpoint` is compromised or misused, it could lead to an uncontrolled increase in token supply, diluting the value of existing tokens held by users.
FixToken holders should be aware that the `endpoint` address has the power to mint new tokens. It is critical to understand who controls this `endpoint` and what safeguards are in place to prevent its misuse. The project team should provide clear documentation on the `endpoint`'s role, its security measures, and the circumstances under which new tokens might be minted.
StatusUnresolved
Medium

Liquidity not locked

QA-LIQUIDITY0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0xdf8a…5978 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 93% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.
Issue0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0xdf8a…5978 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 93% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.
FixCheck the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Who holds the supply

QA-HOLDERSThe ten largest holders own 91.9% of supply. Of that, 1.9% burned, 3.0% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 32.4% in wallets, 54.6% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 3.0%. 4,997 holders in total.
IssueThe ten largest holders own 91.9% of supply. Of that, 1.9% burned, 3.0% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 32.4% in wallets, 54.6% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 3.0%. 4,997 holders in total.
FixWatch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Listed, but not independently verified

QA-IDENTITYListed on CoinGecko as Griffin AI (GAIN). 4,997 holders.
IssueListed on CoinGecko as Griffin AI (GAIN). 4,997 holders.
FixMatch the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

The market for this token

QA-MARKETLiquidity $85K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $798K (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $364K (DexScreener, all pools). CoinGecko's record for this coin: all-time high $0.0277 on 2025-10-09; the price is now 90.5357% below it.
IssueLiquidity $85K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $798K (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $364K (DexScreener, all pools). CoinGecko's record for this coin: all-time high $0.0277 on 2025-10-09; the price is now 90.5357% below it.
FixSize any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Asset class: Project token

QA-PROFILEA token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a 3-of-6 multisig. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $85K of DEX liquidity across 3 pools. Launch: 371 days of market history.
IssueA token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a 3-of-6 multisig. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $85K of DEX liquidity across 3 pools. Launch: 371 days of market history.
FixCheck the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalLow8/10

The contract implements the ERC-20 standard and integrates LayerZero's OFT functionality, enabling cross-chain token transfers. Ownership is managed via `Ownable2Step`, enhancing access control for administrative functions like `setMsgInspector` and `setPeer`. However, the `send`, `lzReceiveSimulate`, and `lzReceive` functions, restricted to the `endpoint`, can increase the total supply of tokens (7.2 Code Security). This minting capability poses a technical risk as it can dilute existing token holders.

GovernanceHigh1/10

The contract's ownership is retained and secured by a 3/6 multisig, which is a robust access control mechanism for administrative functions (7.3 Access Control). The owner can configure critical parameters such as `setPeer`, influencing the cross-chain operations. Economically, the ability for the `endpoint` to mint new tokens via `send` or `lzReceive` functions introduces a significant risk of supply inflation (7.4 Economic). This mechanism, while potentially intended for cross-chain bridging, could lead to unexpected token dilution if not properly managed or if the `endpoint`'s security is compromised.

UpgradesHigh3/10

The contract is not designed as a proxy and does not include explicit upgradeability mechanisms (7.7 Upgrades). This means the contract's logic is immutable once deployed, providing certainty regarding its long-term behavior. Any changes to the contract's functionality would require a new deployment and migration of assets, which is a standard approach for non-upgradeable contracts.

Security Checklist

2/5 checks passed
Contract VerifiedPass
Ownership RenouncedFail
No Mint FunctionFail
Liquidity LockedFail
Not a ProxyPass
HoneypotNoneBuy Tax0.0%Sell Tax0.0%

Holder Composition

91.9% in top 10
32.4% in wallets54.6% in contracts
Effective Concentration54.3%

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Liquidity Depth

$85.3K across 3 pairs
Pancakeswap v3USDTanalysed$79.8K93.5%UniswapUSDT$5.6K6.5%Pancakeswap v2WBNB$00.0%

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

LP Distribution

Top-1 Unlocked Holder100.0%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%

Key Addresses

2 addresses
Deployer
0x3906…b0ad
Unlocked LP Held By
0xdf8a…5978

What Raised This Score

3 factors
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by endpoint: Other-Contract
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool; this pool is 93% of DEX liquidity) — who holds it cannot be verified
  • Top-10 concentration > 50% (91.9% total → 54.3% effective; 32.4% in EOAs, 54.6% in contracts; 4.9% burned, locked or in pools excluded)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Related Audits

6 more on the record
BNB Attestation (BAS)Medium RiskFilecoin (FIL)Medium RiskStarpower Network (STAR)Medium RiskXRP Token (XRP)Medium RiskBTCB Token (BTCB)Medium Risk孙小圣Medium Risk

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of GriffinAI?

Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.

Get Detailed Audit