Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
BNB ChainThe contract at the provided address is not verified on the BSC block explorer.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 21, 2026
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, preventing any security assessment of the logic.
Verify the contract source code on the block explorer to allow for community and security review.
Unresolved
The contract is controlled by an EOA and ownership has not been renounced, allowing the owner to potentially execute arbitrary administrative functions.
Renounce ownership or transfer control to a multi-signature wallet or a time-locked governance contract.
Unresolved
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 0.1% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 0.0% in wallets, 99.8% in other contracts. 8 holders in total.
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Acknowledged
8 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Acknowledged
Liquidity $1.6M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $361K (DexScreener, all pools).
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Acknowledged
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: a single wallet (EOA). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $1.6M of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 2 days of market history.
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Acknowledged
The token's oldest DEX pool is 2 days old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Acknowledged
The contract at the provided address is not verified on the BSC block explorer. Consequently, the source code is inaccessible for security analysis. The contract is controlled by an EOA (Externally Owned Account), and ownership has not been renounced, presenting a significant centralization risk.
7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security cannot be assessed due to lack of source code. 7.3 Access Control is opaque, as the contract logic is hidden from public view. 7.6 External interactions remain unknown, posing a risk of hidden backdoors or malicious logic.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance parameters are entirely controlled by an EOA. Without verified code, there is no transparency regarding tax mechanisms, minting capabilities, or liquidity lock status. The lack of renounced ownership allows the owner to potentially modify tokenomics or restrict trading at will.
7.7 Upgrades and 7.8 Operations are unverifiable. While the contract is not identified as a standard proxy, the lack of source code prevents confirmation of immutability. Users should assume the contract logic could be malicious or subject to arbitrary changes if the owner possesses hidden administrative functions.
Do not interact with this contract. The absence of verified source code makes it impossible to distinguish between a legitimate project and a malicious honeypot or rug-pull mechanism.
Investors should prioritize projects with fully verified, audited, and transparent codebases.
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page
