Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

Is Forest Safe?

FORESTBNB Chain
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 21, 2026 · 1 audit on record
SummaryAI Copilot

The BridgeToken contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation utilizing a Beacon proxy pattern.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • Upgradeable proxy — the admin can replace the logic
  • Liquidity not locked
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • Upgradeable proxy — the admin can replace the logic
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool; this pool is 91% of DEX liquidity) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (96.3% total → 45.5% effective; 12.2% in EOAs, 83.3% in contracts; 0.8% burned, locked or in pools excluded)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 213 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRetained
MintMintable
Liquidity lockNot locked
UpgradeabilityUpgradeable
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 21, 20265,764 holders
83.3%Contracts12.2%Wallets3.7%
83.3%Contracts12.2%3.7%
ContractsWalletsDEX poolsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
96.3%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking83.3%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell12.2%
  • DEX poolsthe pools' own liquidity0.8%
  • Everyone else5,754 holders3.7%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads45.5%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 21, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 21$400.5K across 7 pairs
LP tokensNot locked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.

Analysed pool$363.9KShare of depth90.9%
Top-1 Unlocked Holder90.1%
Top-3 Unlocked97.4%
Unlocked LP held by
0xf949…02980x9d56…e0ee0x734c…139a0x9626…5bc30x1569…a9480xa395…f4570x3282…c7f00xf32c…58b2

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

Security Findings

2 Medium5 Info
Medium

Liquidity not locked

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 8 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0xf949…0298 — holds 90.1% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 91% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 8 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0xf949…0298 — holds 90.1% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 91% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Medium

What the token's controller can do

The contract lets its controller — a contract — mint new supply. Nothing independent vouches for whoever holds them, so each is a live risk to holders.QA-POWERS

Issue

The contract lets its controller — a contract — mint new supply. Nothing independent vouches for whoever holds them, so each is a live risk to holders.

Fix

Check who holds these powers and whether a timelock or multisig stands between them and holders.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

No issues identified in the reviewed source

The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.I-01

Issue

The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.

Fix

Re-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 96.3% of supply. Of that, 0.8% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 12.2% in wallets, 83.3% in other contracts. 5,764 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 96.3% of supply. Of that, 0.8% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 12.2% in wallets, 83.3% in other contracts. 5,764 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Listed, but not independently verified

Listed on CoinGecko as Forest Protocol (FOREST), market cap $2M, rank #2563. 5,764 holders.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

Listed on CoinGecko as Forest Protocol (FOREST), market cap $2M, rank #2563. 5,764 holders.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $401K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $147K (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $1.4M (DexScreener, all pools). CoinGecko's record for this coin: all-time high $0.246 on 2026-05-10; the price is now 92.3949% below it.QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $401K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $147K (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $1.4M (DexScreener, all pools). CoinGecko's record for this coin: all-time high $0.246 on 2026-05-10; the price is now 92.3949% below it.

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a contract. Code: upgradeable proxy. Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $401K of DEX liquidity across 7 pools. Launch: 417 days of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a contract. Code: upgradeable proxy. Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $401K of DEX liquidity across 7 pools. Launch: 417 days of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 21
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The BridgeToken contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation utilizing a Beacon proxy pattern. The contract provides core token functionality with centralized administrative control over minting and metadata updates. No critical vulnerabilities were identified in the provided code map.

Technical7/10Low risk

The architecture follows a standard Beacon proxy pattern, ensuring consistent implementation across multiple instances. 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security are robust, utilizing standard OpenZeppelin-like patterns for ERC-20 compliance. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via the onlyOwner modifier on sensitive functions like mint and updateDetails. 7.6 External interactions are limited to standard token operations, minimizing attack surface.

Governance4/10Medium risk

7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance risks are centered on the centralized owner address, which is currently an external contract. The owner has the authority to mint new tokens, which directly impacts the circulating supply and token value. 7.8 Operations are dependent on the owner's security posture to prevent unauthorized minting or metadata manipulation.

Upgrades1/10High risk

7.7 Upgrades are managed via a Beacon proxy, which is a secure and standard approach for multi-contract deployments. This allows for efficient implementation updates while maintaining state consistency. The upgrade mechanism is well-isolated from the core token logic.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The protocol should ensure that the owner address (currently an external contract) is secured by a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to mitigate the risk of single-point-of-failure.

Regular monitoring of the mint function is recommended to ensure supply changes remain within expected parameters.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeBridgeToken
NetworkBNB Chain
Token age1y
Contract0x11cf…a7d0
Deployer0xd0bf…a524
Proxy Upgrade Controls
Proxy TypeBeacon
ImplementationVerified source
Badge for your website
Forest security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 21, 202654Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the FOREST contract address?

The Forest contract on BNB Chain is 0x11cf6bf6d87cb0eb9c294fd6cbfec91ee3a1a7d0. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is Forest a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for Forest is 54/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 21, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Upgradeable; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Is FOREST liquidity locked?

Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 21, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $400.5K.

Who holds FOREST?

As of Oct 21, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 96.3% of the supply across 5,764 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Forest?

Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page