The contract at the provided address is not verified on the block explorer. Consequently, the source code is inaccessible for security analysis. Investors should exercise extreme caution as the lack of transparency prevents verification of ownership, tax mechanisms, or potential backdoors.

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is FIST Agent a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The contract at the provided address is not verified on the block explorer.
Read the full analysis- Mint capability UNKNOWN
- Liquidity not locked
- Liquidity < $50k
- Volume/Liquidity > 10×
- Top-10 concentration > 20%
- Contract source not verified — its logic cannot be read
Exact factors
- Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
- Liquidity < $50k ($26,188 across 1 pairs — thin market)
- Volume/Liquidity > 10× (12.1× — possible wash trading)
- Top-10 concentration > 20% (56.2% total → 22.8% effective; 0.6% in EOAs, 55.6% in contracts)
- Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Nov 1Holders
as of audit · Nov 1, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking55.6%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell0.6%
- Everyone else4,963 holders43.8%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 1, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Nov 1The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0x62a4…bf0cNo privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.
Security Findings
CriticalUnverified Source Code
The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, preventing any security audit or verification of functionality.C-01
Issue
The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, preventing any security audit or verification of functionality.
Fix
Verify the contract source code on the block explorer immediately.
Status
Unresolved
HighCentralized Ownership
The contract is owned by an EOA, granting the owner full control over administrative functions without transparency.H-01
Issue
The contract is owned by an EOA, granting the owner full control over administrative functions without transparency.
Fix
Renounce ownership or transfer control to a multi-sig wallet if administrative functions are required.
Status
Unresolved
MediumLack of Transparency
The absence of verified code prevents users from identifying potential malicious features such as honeypot mechanisms or excessive transaction taxes.M-01
Issue
The absence of verified code prevents users from identifying potential malicious features such as honeypot mechanisms or excessive transaction taxes.
Fix
Publish the source code and provide documentation for all custom logic.
Status
Unresolved
MediumLiquidity not locked
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0x62a4…bf0c — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0x62a4…bf0c — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 56.2% of supply. What remains: 0.6% in wallets, 55.6% in other contracts. 4,973 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 56.2% of supply. What remains: 0.6% in wallets, 55.6% in other contracts. 4,973 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
4,973 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
4,973 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $26K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $317K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $26K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $317K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: a single wallet (EOA). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $26K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: a single wallet (EOA). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $26K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 1The technical architecture cannot be evaluated due to the lack of verified source code. 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security are impossible to assess. 7.3 Access Control remains opaque, posing a significant risk of hidden administrative functions. 7.6 External dependencies and 7.8 Operations are unknown.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance parameters are hidden from the public. The contract is controlled by an EOA (0x2175...), which implies centralized authority over the token's economic logic. There is no evidence of renounced ownership or decentralized governance mechanisms.
7.7 Upgrades are not applicable as the contract is not a proxy. However, the inability to verify the code means potential hidden upgrade-like logic or logic-swapping functions cannot be ruled out. The current state is static but opaque.
Do not interact with this contract until the source code is verified on the block explorer.
Verify the contract to allow for community audit and transparency regarding tax, minting, or blacklisting capabilities. Prioritize checking for ownership renouncement and liquidity lock status before considering any interaction. Without verified code, the contract should be treated as a high-risk asset.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Nov 1, 202662Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of FIST Agent?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified