Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is Fission a Scam?

FSSNEthereum
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 31, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 1d old
SummaryAI Copilot

The protocol is a standard ERC-20 token implemented via a UUPS proxy pattern.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Upgradeable proxy — the admin can replace the logic
  • 1 proxy upgrade(s) in the last 30 days
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Top-10 concentration > 70%
Exact factors
  • Upgradeable proxy — the admin can replace the logic
  • 1 proxy upgrade(s) in the last 30 days
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Top-10 concentration > 70% (95.1% total → 95.1% effective; 95.1% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (1d old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 315 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRenounced
MintNo mint
Liquidity lockUnknown
UpgradeabilityUpgradeable
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 31, 2026169 holders
95.1%Wallets4.9%
95.1%Wallets4.9%
WalletsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
95.1%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell95.1%
  • Everyone else159 holders4.9%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads95.1%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 31, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 31$274.7K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensUnknown

Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.

Analysed pool$274.7KShare of depth100.0%

Security Findings

6 Info
Info

No issues identified in the reviewed source

The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.I-01

Issue

The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.

Fix

Re-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 95.1% of supply. What remains: 95.1% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 10.7%. 169 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 95.1% of supply. What remains: 95.1% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 10.7%. 169 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

169 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

169 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $275K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $561K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $275K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $561K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: upgradeable proxy. Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $275K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: upgradeable proxy. Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $275K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — 1 day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 31
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The protocol is a standard ERC-20 token implemented via a UUPS proxy pattern. Ownership has been explicitly renounced, meaning no administrative functions can be triggered to alter token logic or state. The codebase follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, and no vulnerabilities were identified in the transfer logic or proxy configuration.

Technical6/10Medium risk

The architecture utilizes a standard UUPS proxy pattern (7.1 Architecture). Code security is robust, adhering to OpenZeppelin standards for ERC-20 (7.2 Code Security). Access control is effectively disabled due to ownership renouncement (7.3 Access Control). No external dependencies or oracle integrations were found (7.6 External).

Governance4/10Medium risk

Economic parameters are fixed as the contract lacks minting or burning capabilities (7.4 Economic). Governance is non-existent due to the renounced ownership status (7.5 Governance). Operations are standard for an ERC-20 token (7.8 Operations).

Upgrades2/10High risk

The contract uses a UUPS proxy pattern (7.7 Upgrades). While the implementation is upgradeable, the renounced ownership prevents any future modifications to the logic. This effectively locks the current implementation, mitigating risks associated with malicious upgrades.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The contract is secure and follows best practices for immutable token deployment.

No further action is required as the renounced ownership ensures the current logic cannot be altered.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeERC1967Proxy
NetworkEthereum
Token age1d
Contract0x66b6…c375
Deployer0xd7f3…0271
Proxy Upgrade Controls
Proxy TypeEip1967 Uups
ImplementationVerified source
Upgrades (30d)1
Badge for your website
Fission security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 31, 202668High

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the FSSN contract address?

The Fission (FSSN) contract on Ethereum is 0x66b67f39dda7137047931ea67c3ea25e2b42c375. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is Fission a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for Fission is 68/100 (High risk) as of Oct 31, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Renounced; Mint: No mint; Upgradeability: Upgradeable; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Who holds FSSN?

As of Oct 31, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 95.1% of the supply across 169 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Fission?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified