Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is Federal Oil Trust Fund (FOTF) a Scam?

FOTFBase
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 25, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 1d old
SummaryAI Copilot

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance, voting, and vesting capabilities.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.2% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.0% in contracts; 3.8% burned, locked or in pools excluded)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (1d old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 254 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRetained
MintMintable
Liquidity lockUnknown
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 25, 20262,285 holders
80.0%Contracts16.2%Wallets3.8%
80.0%Contracts16.2%Wallets3.8%
ContractsWalletsBurnedBubble area = share of supply
100.0%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.0%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
  • Burnedout of circulation3.8%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads48.2%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 25, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 25$77.8K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensUnknown

Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.

Analysed pool$77.8KShare of depth100.0%

Security Findings

2 Medium5 Info
Medium

Centralized Minting Control

The owner has the authority to mint new tokens via the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows the owner to increase the total supply, which directly dilutes the value of existing holdings.CP-01

Issue

The owner has the authority to mint new tokens via the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows the owner to increase the total supply, which directly dilutes the value of existing holdings.

Fix

Transition ownership to a decentralized governance model or implement a hard-coded, immutable minting schedule to remove owner discretion.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Centralized Transfer Control

The owner can toggle the isPoolUnlocked switch using the lockPool and unlockPool functions. This allows the owner to unilaterally freeze or unfreeze token transfers, effectively controlling the liquidity of the token.CP-05

Issue

The owner can toggle the isPoolUnlocked switch using the lockPool and unlockPool functions. This allows the owner to unilaterally freeze or unfreeze token transfers, effectively controlling the liquidity of the token.

Fix

Remove the ability for the owner to pause transfers, or restrict this functionality to a decentralized emergency pause mechanism with a timelock.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 2,285 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 2,285 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

2,285 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

2,285 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $78K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $57K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $78K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $57K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $78K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $78K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — 1 day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 25
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance, voting, and vesting capabilities. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage inflation rates and pool access. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high level of administrative control over supply and transferability presents a significant centralization risk.

Technical8/10Low risk

The architecture utilizes robust, battle-tested OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, voting, and permit functionality. Code security is high, with clear separation of concerns and standard implementation of state variables. 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security are well-implemented, though 7.3 Access Control is highly centralized. The contract avoids common pitfalls like reentrancy by using standard library patterns.

Governance3/10High risk

Economic parameters are governed by the owner, who can mint tokens up to a 2% annual cap. 7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance rely entirely on the owner's discretion, which may not align with decentralized principles. 7.6 External dependencies are minimal, reducing integration risks. The vesting mechanism provides a structured release schedule for participants.

Upgrades4/10Medium risk

The contract is not upgradeable, which eliminates risks associated with proxy patterns. 7.7 Upgrades are not applicable as the logic is immutable. 7.8 Operations are straightforward, relying on standard administrative functions to manage the token lifecycle.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

To improve security and trust, consider transitioning ownership to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract (DAO).

This would mitigate the risks associated with a single point of failure regarding token minting and transfer control. Additionally, implement a timelock mechanism for all privileged functions. A delay on administrative actions like updating mint rates or locking pools would provide transparency and allow the community to react to significant changes in the token's economic policy.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkBase
Token age1d
Contract0x3582…c0e8
Deployer0xfc20…fad9
Badge for your website
Federal Oil Trust Fund (FOTF) security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 25, 202655Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the FOTF contract address?

The Federal Oil Trust Fund (FOTF) (FOTF) contract on Base is 0x35821ba6061fd0a7e9a91751a6d612b88658c0e8. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is Federal Oil Trust Fund (FOTF) a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for Federal Oil Trust Fund (FOTF) is 55/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 25, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Who holds FOTF?

As of Oct 25, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 100.0% of the supply across 2,285 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Federal Oil Trust Fund (FOTF)?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page