Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

Is eUSD Safe?

EUSDPolygon
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 29, 2026 · 1 audit on record
SummaryAI Copilot

The protocol implements a standard upgradeable stablecoin with robust access control and blacklist capabilities.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • Owner can blacklist or freeze individual holders
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN
  • Liquidity not locked
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
  • Code: State Variable Shadowing
Exact factors
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • Owner can blacklist or freeze individual holders
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool; this pool is 84% of DEX liquidity) — who holds it cannot be verified
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (98.6% total → 39.6% effective; 0.3% in EOAs, 98.3% in contracts)
  • Code: State Variable Shadowing (High, static analysis)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 294 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipUnknown
MintMintable
Liquidity lockNot locked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 29, 2026337 holders
98.3%Contracts1.4%
98.3%Contracts
ContractsWalletsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
98.6%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking98.3%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell0.3%
  • Everyone else327 holders1.4%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads39.6%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 29, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 29$1.19M across 5 pairs
  • Uniswap V4 (Polygon)USDCAnalysed$1.00M83.9%
  • Uniswap V4 (Polygon)eMXN$130.1K10.9%
  • Uniswap V4 (Polygon)TEL$62.2K5.2%
  • Uniswap V4 (Polygon)TEL$50.0%
  • Uniswap V4 (Polygon)POL$00.0%

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensNot locked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.

Analysed pool$1.00MShare of depth83.9%
Top-1 Unlocked Holder100.0%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%
Unlocked LP held by
0xd623…ea20

Security Findings

2 High1 Medium4 Info
High

State Variable Shadowing

The contract contains state variables that shadow inherited variables, which can lead to unexpected behavior when accessing storage slots. This occurs when a child contract declares a variable with the same name as one in a parent contract, potentially causing the wrong value to be read or written during execution.CD-01

Issue

The contract contains state variables that shadow inherited variables, which can lead to unexpected behavior when accessing storage slots. This occurs when a child contract declares a variable with the same name as one in a parent contract, potentially causing the wrong value to be read or written during execution.

Fix

Rename the shadowed state variables in the child contract to ensure they are distinct from those in the inherited contracts. Verify the storage layout after the changes to ensure compatibility with the existing proxy state.

Status

Unresolved

High

What the token's controller can do

The contract lets its controller — an owner that could not be resolved — mint new supply; freeze or blacklist individual addresses; pause all transfers. Nothing independent vouches for whoever holds them, so each is a live risk to holders.QA-POWERS

Issue

The contract lets its controller — an owner that could not be resolved — mint new supply; freeze or blacklist individual addresses; pause all transfers. Nothing independent vouches for whoever holds them, so each is a live risk to holders.

Fix

Check who holds these powers and whether a timelock or multisig stands between them and holders.

Status

Acknowledged

Medium

Liquidity not locked

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0xd623…ea20 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 84% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0xd623…ea20 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 84% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 98.6% of supply. What remains: 0.3% in wallets, 98.3% in other contracts. 337 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 98.6% of supply. What remains: 0.3% in wallets, 98.3% in other contracts. 337 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Listed, but not independently verified

Listed on CoinGecko as eUSD (EUSD), market cap $10M, rank #1260. 337 holders.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

Listed on CoinGecko as eUSD (EUSD), market cap $10M, rank #1260. 337 holders.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $1.2M (GeckoTerminal, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.2M (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $148K (GeckoTerminal, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $1.2M (GeckoTerminal, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.2M (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $148K (GeckoTerminal, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Stablecoin — backing unverified

A token designed to hold a fixed value (usually $1). Its safety rests on what backs it and on who can mint, freeze or pause it. Its identity is not independently verified, so it gets none of the allowances an established stablecoin gets: every power its owner holds over supply and transfers is scored in full, because a peg is only as good as whoever can mint. Basis: CoinGecko category: Stablecoins. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $1.2M of DEX liquidity across 5 pools. Launch: 288 days of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token designed to hold a fixed value (usually $1). Its safety rests on what backs it and on who can mint, freeze or pause it. Its identity is not independently verified, so it gets none of the allowances an established stablecoin gets: every power its owner holds over supply and transfers is scored in full, because a peg is only as good as whoever can mint. Basis: CoinGecko category: Stablecoins. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $1.2M of DEX liquidity across 5 pools. Launch: 288 days of market history.

Fix

Check what backs the peg and who controls supply: reserve attestations for an issuer-backed coin, collateral and governance for a protocol coin.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 29
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The protocol implements a standard upgradeable stablecoin with robust access control and blacklist capabilities. The architecture relies on OpenZeppelin's upgradeable patterns, ensuring standard compliance. While the system is well-structured, the presence of state shadowing requires attention to prevent logic errors during future upgrades.

Technical6/10Medium risk

The architecture utilizes a modular approach with clear separation of concerns via AccessControl. 7.1 Architecture is sound, leveraging standard proxy patterns. 7.2 Code Security is high, though 7.3 Access Control requires strict key management for roles like MINTER_ROLE and BLACKLISTER_ROLE. 7.6 External dependencies are limited to well-vetted OpenZeppelin libraries.

Governance1/10High risk

7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance risks are centralized under the admin roles. The ability to mint and blacklist provides necessary operational control but introduces significant trust requirements. 7.8 Operations are supported by pause/unpause functionality to mitigate emergency risks.

Upgrades2/10High risk

7.7 Upgrades are managed via a Beacon Proxy pattern, allowing for centralized implementation updates. This provides high flexibility but necessitates rigorous testing of storage layouts. The identified shadowing issue poses a risk if not addressed before future implementation deployments.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The protocol should prioritize the resolution of the identified state shadowing issue to ensure storage integrity across future upgrades.

It is recommended to implement a multi-signature wallet for all privileged roles to prevent single points of failure in administrative actions. Regular audits of the Beacon implementation are advised whenever logic changes are introduced. Ensure that all role-granting processes are documented and audited to maintain the integrity of the access control system.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeBeaconProxy
NetworkPolygon
Token age9mo
Contract0x1491…2949
Deployer0x417b…00d8
Badge for your website
eUSD security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 29, 202669High

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of eUSD?

Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified