On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?
PolygonThe contract is a standard EIP-1967 proxy implementation used to delegate calls to an underlying logic contract.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 20, 2026
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0xa570…86980x7fcf…055a0x603b…b3a30x619f…43750xad69…08960x83a2…825f0x7ee1…510a0x0968…4cb80x3383…aecc0xb663…29240.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 3 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0xa570…8698 — holds 58.6% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Acknowledged
The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.
Re-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.
Acknowledged
The ten largest holders own 82.0% of supply. Of that, 2.5% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 36.2% in wallets, 43.2% in other contracts. 3,188 holders in total.
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Acknowledged
Listed on CoinGecko as Forta (FORT), market cap $14M, rank #995. 3,188 holders.
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Acknowledged
Liquidity $24K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.6M (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $46K (DexScreener, all pools). CoinGecko's record for this coin: all-time high $0.965 on 2022-06-15; the price is now 97.6996% below it.
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Acknowledged
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: upgradeable proxy. Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $24K of DEX liquidity across 2 pools. Launch: 1550 days of market history.
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Acknowledged
The contract is a standard EIP-1967 proxy implementation used to delegate calls to an underlying logic contract. The proxy itself contains no business logic, state variables, or privileged functions, serving purely as a transparent forwarding layer. No vulnerabilities were identified in the proxy structure itself.
The architecture follows the standard EIP-1967 proxy pattern, ensuring clean separation between the proxy and implementation. 7.1 Architecture is robust, utilizing standard storage slots to prevent collisions. 7.2 Code Security is high as the contract relies on battle-tested OpenZeppelin libraries. 7.6 External interactions are limited to delegatecalls, which are handled correctly.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance items are not applicable as the proxy contract holds no assets and contains no governance logic. The contract acts strictly as a forwarding mechanism. All economic risks are deferred to the implementation contract.
7.7 Upgrades are managed via the standard EIP-1967 storage slot mechanism. The proxy supports secure implementation updates if the underlying logic contract includes appropriate access control. No issues were found regarding the upgradeability mechanism itself.
As this is a standard proxy contract, ensure that the implementation contract () is audited for business logic and access control vulnerabilities.
Future upgrades should be performed through a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to mitigate centralization risks.
Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page
