The PermittableToken contract is a centralized ERC-20 implementation with extensive administrative privileges. While it follows standard token patterns, the owner possesses significant power to mint tokens and manipulate user balances, creating a high level of trust dependency. The contract lacks modern security features like reentrancy guards, though the current logic is relatively straightforward.

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?
Is ELA on Ethereum Safe?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The PermittableToken contract is a centralized ERC-20 implementation with extensive administrative privileges.
Read the full analysis- Owner can change any holder's balance
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- Liquidity not locked
- Top-10 concentration > 70%
Exact factors
- Owner can change any holder's balance (seize or credit tokens)
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool; this pool is 99% of DEX liquidity) — who holds it cannot be verified
- Top-10 concentration > 70% (79.7% total → 70.9% effective; 65.0% in EOAs, 14.7% in contracts)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Nov 3Holders
as of audit · Nov 3, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking14.7%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell65.0%
- Everyone else2,753 holders20.3%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 3, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Nov 3The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0xf06b…c0eb0xd5a5…7a3a0xa0b3…afd10xc0e8…58cdSecurity Findings
HighOwner can manipulate user balances
Functions like transferAndCall, push, pull, and move allow the owner to directly modify balances or move funds from any user address, posing a critical risk to asset security.CP-02
Issue
Functions like transferAndCall, push, pull, and move allow the owner to directly modify balances or move funds from any user address, posing a critical risk to asset security.
Fix
Remove administrative functions that allow direct manipulation of user balances to ensure user sovereignty over their assets.
Status
Unresolved
MediumOwner can mint new tokens
The mint(address,uint256) function allows the owner to create new tokens, which increases the total supply and dilutes the value of existing holdings.CP-01
Issue
The mint(address,uint256) function allows the owner to create new tokens, which increases the total supply and dilutes the value of existing holdings.
Fix
Restrict minting to a capped amount or remove the function entirely if the total supply should be fixed.
Status
Unresolved
MediumLiquidity not locked
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 2 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0xf06b…c0eb — holds 99.8% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 2 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0xf06b…c0eb — holds 99.8% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
MediumThe market for this token
Liquidity $96K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $4.1M (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $582K (DexScreener, all pools). CoinGecko's record for this coin: all-time high $89.14 on 2018-02-23; the price is now 99.3901% below it.QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $96K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $4.1M (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $582K (DexScreener, all pools). CoinGecko's record for this coin: all-time high $89.14 on 2018-02-23; the price is now 99.3901% below it.
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 79.7% of supply. What remains: 65.0% in wallets, 14.7% in other contracts. 2,763 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 79.7% of supply. What remains: 65.0% in wallets, 14.7% in other contracts. 2,763 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoListed, but not independently verified
Listed on CoinGecko as Elastos (ELA), market cap $13M, rank #1090. Traded on Coinbase. 2,763 holders.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
Listed on CoinGecko as Elastos (ELA), market cap $13M, rank #1090. Traded on Coinbase. 2,763 holders.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $96K of DEX liquidity across 4 pools. Launch: 1953 days of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $96K of DEX liquidity across 4 pools. Launch: 1953 days of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 3The architecture follows standard ERC-20 patterns with additional bridge and permit functionality. 7.1 Architecture: Centralized control via owner. 7.2 Code Security: Uses SafeMath for arithmetic operations. 7.3 Access Control: Heavily reliant on owner-restricted functions. 7.6 External: Integrates with bridge contracts via setBridgeContract.
7.4 Economic: The owner can mint tokens at will, directly impacting token value. 7.5 Governance: No decentralized governance mechanism exists; all power is concentrated in the owner address. 7.8 Operations: The owner can move any user's funds, representing a significant operational risk to token holders.
7.7 Upgrades: The contract is not a proxy and cannot be upgraded. This provides immutability but prevents patching vulnerabilities post-deployment.
Token holders should be aware that the contract owner has full control over the total supply and individual user balances.
It is recommended that the owner address be transitioned to a multi-signature wallet or a time-locked governance contract to mitigate the risk of single-point-of-failure compromise.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Nov 3, 202675High
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the ELA contract address?
The ELA on Ethereum (ELA) contract on Ethereum is 0xe6fd75ff38adca4b97fbcd938c86b98772431867. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is ELA on Ethereum a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for ELA on Ethereum is 75/100 (High risk) as of Nov 3, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Is ELA liquidity locked?
Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Nov 3, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $96.0K.
Who holds ELA?
As of Nov 3, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 79.7% of the supply across 2,763 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of ELA on Ethereum?
Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified