On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?
EthereumThe eXRD contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional minting and ownership management capabilities.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 7, 2026
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0x10bc…b0290x6d72…a8e50xcb82…6cd20xd7c8…ec060x717f…b0ba0xfcd8…a35b0x01cb…4fa30xfa53…b93d0xbdf3…de810xed89…ebcaThe mint(address,uint256) function allows addresses with the MinterRole or OwnerRole to create new tokens at will. This centralizes control over the total supply and allows privileged users to dilute the holdings of existing token holders.
Restrict the minting capability to a multi-signature wallet or a time-locked governance contract to prevent unilateral supply changes. Consider implementing a hard cap on the total supply if the tokenomics allow for it.
Unresolved
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 95.1% is held, unlocked, by 10 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0x10bc…b029 — holds 63.2% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 93% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Acknowledged
Liquidity $58K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $46K (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $39K (DexScreener, all pools). CoinGecko's record for this coin: all-time high $0.66 on 2021-11-14; the price is now 99.9443% below it.
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Acknowledged
The ten largest holders own 51.8% of supply. Of that, 8.8% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 40.4% in wallets, 2.7% in other contracts. 13,706 holders in total.
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Acknowledged
Listed on CoinGecko as e-Radix (EXRD), rank #4406. 13,706 holders.
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Acknowledged
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $58K of DEX liquidity across 3 pools. Launch: 2186 days of market history.
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Acknowledged
The eXRD contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional minting and ownership management capabilities. The architecture is straightforward, relying on established OpenZeppelin-style patterns for role-based access control. While the minting functionality introduces centralization risks, the code follows standard practices for token management.
The contract utilizes standard ERC-20 logic for transfers and allowances, ensuring 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security standards are met. 7.3 Access Control is implemented via OwnerRole and MinterRole, which effectively restrict sensitive functions. 7.6 External interactions are minimal, reducing the surface for external exploits. The code is clean and follows established patterns for token minting and burning.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance risks are centered on the ability of privileged addresses to mint tokens. The mint(address,uint256) function allows minters to increase the total supply, which directly impacts token holder value. While this is a common feature for utility tokens, it requires trust in the entities holding the minter roles. 7.8 Operations are transparent, as roles can be managed via add/remove functions.
The contract is not upgradeable, which eliminates 7.7 Upgrades risks related to proxy patterns. The logic is immutable, providing certainty to users regarding the token's behavior. No proxy or beacon patterns are utilized in this implementation.
The protocol should ensure that the addresses assigned to the MinterRole are secured using multi-signature wallets to prevent unauthorized minting.
Regular audits of the minter list are recommended to ensure only necessary entities retain the ability to issue new tokens.
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified
