Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is Commonplace a Scam?

COMMONPLACEBase

Not verified

This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →

Last checked Oct 31, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 17h old

Chart

63/ 100

Medium RiskHow is this score calculated?

How the score breaks downratings: 10 is safest

Technical8/10 Governance3/10 Upgrades7/10 Checks passed5 of 7 Findings3 Medium · 5 Info8

SummaryAI Copilot

The DopplerERC20V1 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with governance voting capabilities, deployed as an EIP-1167 minimal clone.

Read the full analysis

What raised the score

Owner can pause all transfers
A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through; held by controller: EOA
LP lock status UNKNOWN — the deepest pool's LP could not be read; this pool is 99% of DEX liquidity
Liquidity not locked
Top-10 concentration > 20%
Code: Inability to Withdraw Trapped ETH

Exact factors

Owner can pause all transfers
A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through; held by controller: EOA
LP lock status UNKNOWN — the deepest pool's LP could not be read; this pool is 99% of DEX liquidity
Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool; this pool is 0% of DEX liquidity) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
Top-10 concentration > 20% (61.5% total → 29.8% effective; 8.6% in EOAs, 52.9% in contracts)
Code: Inability to Withdraw Trapped ETH (Medium, static analysis)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (17h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 315 of 7 checks passed

Contract verifiedVerified

OwnershipRetained

MintNo mint

Liquidity lockNot locked

UpgradeabilityFixed code

HoneypotNone found

Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 31, 2026302 holders

ContractsWalletsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply

61.5%of supply sits with the top 10 holders

Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking52.9%
Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell8.6%
Everyone else292 holders38.5%

Effective concentrationwhat the score reads29.8%

How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 31, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 31$94.4K across 8 pairs

Show 2 more pairs

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensNot locked

The LP tokens of the checked pool, Uniswap v4, are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity. The LP of the deepest pool (99.4% of depth) could not be read, so whether it is locked is unknown.

Checked pool$10Share of depth0.0%

Top-1 Unlocked Holder78.8%

Top-3 Unlocked100.0%

Unlocked LP held by

0x0092…294f0x25aa…fe51

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

Security Findings

3 Medium5 Info

Medium

Inability to Withdraw Trapped ETH

The contract is capable of receiving ETH but lacks any functionality to withdraw or transfer it out. Any ETH sent to the contract address will be permanently locked.CD-01

Issue

The contract is capable of receiving ETH but lacks any functionality to withdraw or transfer it out. Any ETH sent to the contract address will be permanently locked.

Fix

Add an owner-restricted function to withdraw ETH from the contract balance to ensure funds are not permanently trapped.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Centralized Control Over Token Transfers

The contract includes administrative functions (lockPool, unlockPool, disableBalanceLimit, release) that allow the owner or controller to restrict or enable token transfers. This grants the privileged addresses the ability to halt trading or modify transfer rules at their discretion.CP-05

Issue

Fix

Implement a timelock for administrative actions or move these controls to a decentralized governance contract to reduce the impact of a single point of failure.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Liquidity not locked

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 2 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0x0092…294f — holds 78.8% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 61.5% of supply. What remains: 8.6% in wallets, 52.9% in other contracts. 302 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 61.5% of supply. What remains: 8.6% in wallets, 52.9% in other contracts. 302 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

302 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

302 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $94K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $501K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $94K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $501K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Governance token

A token whose main use is voting on a protocol's decisions (delegation and vote checkpoints in its code). The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: vote delegation in its code. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $94K of DEX liquidity across 8 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

Fix

Check how much of the voting supply insiders hold and what governance can change.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 31

Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The DopplerERC20V1 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with governance voting capabilities, deployed as an EIP-1167 minimal clone. The contract implements centralized control mechanisms that allow the owner and controller to restrict token transfers and manage balance limits. While the core ERC-20 logic is standard, the presence of administrative switches and the inability to recover trapped ETH represent the primary security considerations.

Technical8/10Low risk

The contract utilizes well-tested OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20 and governance functionality. 7.1 Architecture: The EIP-1167 clone pattern ensures immutable logic. 7.2 Code Security: The implementation is clean and follows standard patterns. 7.3 Access Control: Privileged functions are correctly restricted to the owner or controller roles.

Governance3/10High risk

7.4 Economic: The protocol introduces centralized control over token liquidity via pool locking mechanisms. 7.5 Governance: Voting power is integrated via ERC20Votes, though administrative centralization remains a factor. 7.6 External: The contract interacts with standard Base network primitives without complex external dependencies.

Upgrades7/10Low risk

7.7 Upgrades: The contract is an immutable EIP-1167 clone; it cannot be upgraded. 7.8 Operations: Administrative functions are clearly defined and restricted. No further upgrade path exists for the logic layer.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

It is recommended to implement a recovery function for trapped ETH to prevent loss of funds sent to the contract address by mistake.

Additionally, consider documenting the specific conditions under which the owner or controller will exercise their power to lock pools or disable balance limits to ensure transparency for token holders.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record

TypeProxy, Token

NetworkBase

Token age17h

Contract0x334d…5ba3

Deployer0x2d3f…4a28

Badge for your website

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History

Oct 31, 202663Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the COMMONPLACE contract address?

The Commonplace contract on Base is 0x334dbefdedc6ff68d5a883e5ea27a37a137d5ba3. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.