Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is Cheese a Scam?

CHEESEBNB Chain
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Nov 2, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 6h old
SummaryAI Copilot

CheeseToken is an ERC-20 token with centralized administrative controls.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Owner can change any holder's balance
  • Owner can change the buy/sell tax; held by system: Other-Contract
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by system: Other-Contract
  • Liquidity < $50k
  • Volume/Liquidity > 15×
  • Top-10 concentration > 20%
  • Code: Rounding Loss in Calculations
Exact factors
  • Owner can change any holder's balance (seize or credit tokens); held by system: Other-Contract
  • Owner can change the buy/sell tax; held by system: Other-Contract
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by system: Other-Contract
  • Liquidity < $50k ($12,636 across 1 pairs — thin market)
  • Volume/Liquidity > 15× (21.5× — wash-trading signal)
  • Top-10 concentration > 20% (84.0% total → 21.4% effective; 15.8% in EOAs, 14.0% in contracts; 54.2% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
  • Code: Rounding Loss in Calculations (Low, static analysis)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (6h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Nov 24 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRetained
MintMintable
Liquidity lockLocked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax2% / 3%

Holders

as of audit · Nov 2, 2026335 holders
14.0%Contracts15.8%Wallets54.2%DEX pools16.0%Everyone else
14.0%15.8%54.2%DEX pools16.0%
ContractsWalletsDEX poolsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
84.0%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking14.0%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell15.8%
  • DEX poolsthe pools' own liquidity54.2%
  • Everyone else325 holders16.0%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads21.4%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 2, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Nov 2$12.6K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensLocked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.

Analysed pool$12.6KShare of depth100.0%
LP Burned100.0% · ≈ permanent lock
LP Locked100.0% · Null Address

Security Findings

1 High2 Medium1 Low6 Info
High

Arbitrary Balance Manipulation

The 'system' address can call burnBySystem to remove tokens from any user's balance, effectively allowing the controller to seize or destroy user funds.CP-02

Issue

The 'system' address can call burnBySystem to remove tokens from any user's balance, effectively allowing the controller to seize or destroy user funds.

Fix

Remove the ability for the system to burn tokens from arbitrary addresses; restrict burning to the caller's own balance.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Centralized Supply Control

The 'system' address can mint new tokens at will using mintEarnable and mintPoolSeed, which dilutes the value of existing holdings.CP-01

Issue

The 'system' address can mint new tokens at will using mintEarnable and mintPoolSeed, which dilutes the value of existing holdings.

Fix

Implement a hard cap on total supply or move minting authority to a decentralized governance process.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Centralized Fee Management

The 'system' address can influence transfer fees and tax collection, allowing for dynamic changes to the economic cost of trading.CP-07

Issue

The 'system' address can influence transfer fees and tax collection, allowing for dynamic changes to the economic cost of trading.

Fix

Define fee parameters in the contract as constants or use a governance-controlled parameter with a maximum cap.

Status

Unresolved

Low

Rounding Loss in Calculations

The contract performs division before multiplication in the _update function, which can lead to precision loss during fee calculations.CD-01

Issue

The contract performs division before multiplication in the _update function, which can lead to precision loss during fee calculations.

Fix

Always multiply before dividing to maintain precision, or use a library like ABDKMath64x64 for fixed-point arithmetic.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 84.0% of supply. Of that, 54.2% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 15.8% in wallets, 14.0% in other contracts. 335 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 84.0% of supply. Of that, 54.2% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 15.8% in wallets, 14.0% in other contracts. 335 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

335 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

335 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Liquidity burned — cannot be withdrawn

100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $13K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $271K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $13K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $271K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: system — a contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 2% on buy, 3% on sell. Market: $13K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: system — a contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 2% on buy, 3% on sell. Market: $13K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 2
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

CheeseToken is an ERC-20 token with centralized administrative controls. The system relies on a 'system' address that holds significant power over token supply, user balances, and transfer fees. While the code follows standard ERC-20 patterns, the centralization of power presents a high risk to token holders.

Technical6/10Medium risk

The contract implements standard ERC-20 functionality with robust library usage. 7.1 Architecture is straightforward, utilizing a single-contract design. 7.2 Code Security is generally high, though 7.4 Economic logic contains rounding risks. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via the 'onlySystem' modifier, though this creates a single point of failure.

Governance1/10High risk

7.5 Governance is entirely centralized under the 'system' address, which lacks transparency or time-locks. 7.4 Economic risks are significant as the system can arbitrarily mint tokens or burn user balances. This design allows for potential rug-pull scenarios or unfair fee adjustments without community oversight.

Upgrades4/10Medium risk

7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy. The logic is immutable, which provides security against hidden logic changes but prevents emergency patching. 7.8 Operations are limited to the functions defined at deployment.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The protocol should transition to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to manage the 'system' role.

Implementing a time-lock on administrative functions would provide users with visibility into upcoming changes to fees or supply.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeCheeseToken
NetworkBNB Chain
Token age6h
Contract0x8caf…6e94
Deployer0xa4c9…1619
Badge for your website
Cheese security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Nov 2, 202669High

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Cheese?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified