CheeseToken is an ERC-20 token with centralized administrative controls. The system relies on a 'system' address that holds significant power over token supply, user balances, and transfer fees. While the code follows standard ERC-20 patterns, the centralization of power presents a high risk to token holders.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is Cheese a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →CheeseToken is an ERC-20 token with centralized administrative controls.
Read the full analysis- Owner can change any holder's balance
- Owner can change the buy/sell tax; held by system: Other-Contract
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by system: Other-Contract
- Liquidity < $50k
- Volume/Liquidity > 15×
- Top-10 concentration > 20%
- Code: Rounding Loss in Calculations
Exact factors
- Owner can change any holder's balance (seize or credit tokens); held by system: Other-Contract
- Owner can change the buy/sell tax; held by system: Other-Contract
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by system: Other-Contract
- Liquidity < $50k ($12,636 across 1 pairs — thin market)
- Volume/Liquidity > 15× (21.5× — wash-trading signal)
- Top-10 concentration > 20% (84.0% total → 21.4% effective; 15.8% in EOAs, 14.0% in contracts; 54.2% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
- Code: Rounding Loss in Calculations (Low, static analysis)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Nov 2Holders
as of audit · Nov 2, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking14.0%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell15.8%
- DEX poolsthe pools' own liquidity54.2%
- Everyone else325 holders16.0%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 2, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Nov 2The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.
Security Findings
HighArbitrary Balance Manipulation
The 'system' address can call burnBySystem to remove tokens from any user's balance, effectively allowing the controller to seize or destroy user funds.CP-02
Issue
The 'system' address can call burnBySystem to remove tokens from any user's balance, effectively allowing the controller to seize or destroy user funds.
Fix
Remove the ability for the system to burn tokens from arbitrary addresses; restrict burning to the caller's own balance.
Status
Unresolved
MediumCentralized Supply Control
The 'system' address can mint new tokens at will using mintEarnable and mintPoolSeed, which dilutes the value of existing holdings.CP-01
Issue
The 'system' address can mint new tokens at will using mintEarnable and mintPoolSeed, which dilutes the value of existing holdings.
Fix
Implement a hard cap on total supply or move minting authority to a decentralized governance process.
Status
Unresolved
MediumCentralized Fee Management
The 'system' address can influence transfer fees and tax collection, allowing for dynamic changes to the economic cost of trading.CP-07
Issue
The 'system' address can influence transfer fees and tax collection, allowing for dynamic changes to the economic cost of trading.
Fix
Define fee parameters in the contract as constants or use a governance-controlled parameter with a maximum cap.
Status
Unresolved
LowRounding Loss in Calculations
The contract performs division before multiplication in the _update function, which can lead to precision loss during fee calculations.CD-01
Issue
The contract performs division before multiplication in the _update function, which can lead to precision loss during fee calculations.
Fix
Always multiply before dividing to maintain precision, or use a library like ABDKMath64x64 for fixed-point arithmetic.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 84.0% of supply. Of that, 54.2% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 15.8% in wallets, 14.0% in other contracts. 335 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 84.0% of supply. Of that, 54.2% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 15.8% in wallets, 14.0% in other contracts. 335 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
335 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
335 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoLiquidity burned — cannot be withdrawn
100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $13K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $271K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $13K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $271K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: system — a contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 2% on buy, 3% on sell. Market: $13K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: system — a contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 2% on buy, 3% on sell. Market: $13K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 2The contract implements standard ERC-20 functionality with robust library usage. 7.1 Architecture is straightforward, utilizing a single-contract design. 7.2 Code Security is generally high, though 7.4 Economic logic contains rounding risks. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via the 'onlySystem' modifier, though this creates a single point of failure.
7.5 Governance is entirely centralized under the 'system' address, which lacks transparency or time-locks. 7.4 Economic risks are significant as the system can arbitrarily mint tokens or burn user balances. This design allows for potential rug-pull scenarios or unfair fee adjustments without community oversight.
7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy. The logic is immutable, which provides security against hidden logic changes but prevents emergency patching. 7.8 Operations are limited to the functions defined at deployment.
The protocol should transition to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to manage the 'system' role.
Implementing a time-lock on administrative functions would provide users with visibility into upcoming changes to fees or supply.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Nov 2, 202669High
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Cheese?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified